The Golden Bough  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 15:42, 9 July 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Line 1: Line 1:
 +{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
 +| style="text-align: left;" |
 +"THE PRIMARY aim of this book is to explain the remarkable rule which regulated the succession to the priesthood of [[Diana]] at [[Aricia]]."--''[[The Golden Bough]]''''' (1890) by James George Frazer
 +|}
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-'''''The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion''''' is a wide-ranging comparative study of [[mythology]] and [[religion]], written by Scottish anthropologist Sir [[James Frazer|James George Frazer]] ([[1854]]–[[1941]]). It was first published in two volumes in [[1890]]; the third edition, published 1906–15, comprised twelve volumes. It was aimed at a broad literate audience raised on tales as told in such publications as [[Thomas Bulfinch]]'s ''[[Age of Fable]]''. It offered a [[modernist]] approach to discussing religion, treating it dispassionately as a cultural phenomenon rather than from a theological perspective. Although the worth of its contribution to [[anthropology]] will be newly evaluated by each generation, its impact on contemporary European literature was substantial. 
 +'''''The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion''''' (retitled ''The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion'' in its second edition) is a wide-ranging, comparative study of [[mythology]] and [[religion]], written by the Scottish [[Anthropology|anthropologist]] Sir [[James George Frazer]] (1854–1941). It was first published in two volumes in 1890; in three volumes in 1900; the third edition, published 1906–15, comprised twelve volumes. The work was aimed at a wide literate audience raised on tales as told in such publications as [[Thomas Bulfinch]]'s ''[[The Age of Fable, or Stories of Gods and Heroes]]'' (1855).
 +
 +Frazer offered a [[modernist]] approach to discussing religion, treating it [[dispassionate]]ly as a [[Culture|cultural]] phenomenon rather than from a [[Theology|theological]] perspective. The influence of ''The Golden Bough'' on contemporary [[European literature]] and thought was substantial.
 +
 +The book [[scandal]]ized the British public upon its first publication, because it included the [[Christianity|Christian]] story of [[Jesus]] in its comparative study, thus inviting an agnostic reading of the [[Lamb of God]] as a relic of a [[pagan]] religion. Frazer removed his analysis of the [[Crucifixion]] to a speculative appendix for the third edition, and it was entirely missing from the single-volume abridged edition.
==Subject matter== ==Subject matter==
''The Golden Bough'' attempts to define the shared elements of religious belief. Its [[thesis]] is that old religions were [[fertility cult]]s that revolved around the [[worship]] of, and periodic [[sacrifice]] of, a [[sacred king]]. ''The Golden Bough'' attempts to define the shared elements of religious belief. Its [[thesis]] is that old religions were [[fertility cult]]s that revolved around the [[worship]] of, and periodic [[sacrifice]] of, a [[sacred king]].
Line 7: Line 15:
This king was the incarnation of a [[Life-death-rebirth deity|dying and reviving god]], a [[solar deity]] who underwent a mystic [[marriage]] to a [[goddess]] of the Earth, who died at the harvest, and was reincarnated in the spring. Frazer claims that this legend is central to almost all of the world's mythologies. This king was the incarnation of a [[Life-death-rebirth deity|dying and reviving god]], a [[solar deity]] who underwent a mystic [[marriage]] to a [[goddess]] of the Earth, who died at the harvest, and was reincarnated in the spring. Frazer claims that this legend is central to almost all of the world's mythologies.
-The germ for Frazer's thesis was the pre-Roman priest-king at the [[wiktionary:Fane|fane]] of [[Nemi]], who was murdered ritually by his successor:+The germ for Frazer's thesis was the pre-Roman priest-king at the [[Fane|fane]] of [[Nemi]], who was murdered ritually by his successor:
:"When I first put pen to paper to write ''The Golden Bough'' I had no conception of the magnitude of the voyage on which I was embarking; I thought only to explain a single rule of an ancient Italian priesthood." (''Aftermath'' p vi) :"When I first put pen to paper to write ''The Golden Bough'' I had no conception of the magnitude of the voyage on which I was embarking; I thought only to explain a single rule of an ancient Italian priesthood." (''Aftermath'' p vi)
Line 19: Line 27:
Despite whatever controversy the work may have generated, and its critical reception amongst other scholars, ''The Golden Bough'' had a tremendous effect on the literature of the period. [[Robert Graves]] adapted Frazer's concept of the dying king who is sacrificed for the good of the kingdom to the romantic idea of the poet's necessary suffering for the sake of his Muse-Goddess in his Frazer-esque book on poetry, rituals, and myths, ''[[The White Goddess]]'', which was published in 1948. [[William Butler Yeats]] makes reference to it in his poem, "[[Sailing to Byzantium]]". [[H. P. Lovecraft]] mentions the book in his short story "[[The Call of Cthulhu]]". [[T. S. Eliot]] acknowledged indebtedness to Frazer in his first note to his poem ''[[The Waste Land]]''. [[William Carlos Williams]] references it as well in Book Two, part two, of his extended poem in five books, ''[[Paterson]]''. [[James Joyce]], [[Ernest Hemingway]], [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[Aleister Crowley]], [[Ezra Pound]], [[Mary Renault]], [[Joseph Campbell]], [[Naomi Mitchison]] (in her ''The Corn King and the Spring Queen''), and [[Camille Paglia]] are but a few authors deeply influenced by ''The Golden Bough''. Its literary impact has given it continued life, even as its direct influence in anthropology has waned. Despite whatever controversy the work may have generated, and its critical reception amongst other scholars, ''The Golden Bough'' had a tremendous effect on the literature of the period. [[Robert Graves]] adapted Frazer's concept of the dying king who is sacrificed for the good of the kingdom to the romantic idea of the poet's necessary suffering for the sake of his Muse-Goddess in his Frazer-esque book on poetry, rituals, and myths, ''[[The White Goddess]]'', which was published in 1948. [[William Butler Yeats]] makes reference to it in his poem, "[[Sailing to Byzantium]]". [[H. P. Lovecraft]] mentions the book in his short story "[[The Call of Cthulhu]]". [[T. S. Eliot]] acknowledged indebtedness to Frazer in his first note to his poem ''[[The Waste Land]]''. [[William Carlos Williams]] references it as well in Book Two, part two, of his extended poem in five books, ''[[Paterson]]''. [[James Joyce]], [[Ernest Hemingway]], [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[Aleister Crowley]], [[Ezra Pound]], [[Mary Renault]], [[Joseph Campbell]], [[Naomi Mitchison]] (in her ''The Corn King and the Spring Queen''), and [[Camille Paglia]] are but a few authors deeply influenced by ''The Golden Bough''. Its literary impact has given it continued life, even as its direct influence in anthropology has waned.
-==Critical analysis of ''The Golden Bough''==+==Critical analysis==
-The philosopher [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] returned time and again to ''The Golden Bough'', often enough that his commentaries have been compiled as ''Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough'', edited by Rush Rhees, originally published in 1967, with the English edition following in 1971. He writes, "Frazer is much more savage than most of these savages." [[Weston LaBarre]] made the observation that Frazer was "the last of the scholastics", and wrote ''The Golden Bough'' "as an extended footnote to a line in [[Virgil]] he felt he did not understand."+The philosopher [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] returned time and again to ''The Golden Bough'', so much so that his commentaries have been compiled as ''[[Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough]]'', edited by Rush Rhees, originally published in 1967 (the English edition followed in 1971). He writes, "Frazer is much more savage than most of these savages." [[Weston LaBarre]] observed that Frazer was "the last of the [[Scholasticism|scholastics]]" and wrote ''The Golden Bough'' "as an extended footnote to a line in [[Virgil]] he felt he did not understand."
-Some modern criticism sets Frazer in the broader context of the [[history of ideas]], for example, Robert Ackerman in his ''The Myth and Ritual School: J. G. Frazer and the Cambridge Ritualists''. The [[myth and ritual school]] includes scholars [[Jane Ellen Harrison|Jane Harrison]], [[Gilbert Murray]], [[F. M. Cornford]], and [[Arthur Bernard Cook|A.B. Cook]], who were connecting the new discipline of myth theory and anthropology with traditional literary classics at the end of the nineteenth century. This school was an important influence on a great deal of [[Modernism|Modernist literature]].+Some modern critics set Frazer in the broader context of the [[history of ideas]], for example, Robert Ackerman in his ''The Myth and Ritual School: J. G. Frazer and the Cambridge Ritualists''. The [[myth and ritual school]] includes scholars [[Jane Ellen Harrison|Jane Harrison]], [[Gilbert Murray]], [[F. M. Cornford]], and [[Arthur Bernard Cook|A.B. Cook]], who were connecting the new discipline of myth theory and anthropology with traditional literary classics at the end of the nineteenth century. This school was an important influence on much [[Modernist literature]].
==Quotations== ==Quotations==
Line 55: Line 63:
* The book is mentioned in [[Erica Jong]]'s novel ''[[Fear of Flying]]''. * The book is mentioned in [[Erica Jong]]'s novel ''[[Fear of Flying]]''.
* On the popular medical drama, House, M.D., House pretends to be reading The Golden Bough, only for his friends and colleagues to discover it's another book wrapped in the cover. * On the popular medical drama, House, M.D., House pretends to be reading The Golden Bough, only for his friends and colleagues to discover it's another book wrapped in the cover.
 +==TOC==
 +== Contents ==
-==See also==+*[[The Golden Bough/Preface|Preface]]
-*[[Archetypal literary criticism]]+*[[The Golden Bough/Subject Index|Subject Index]]
-*[[Force-fire]]+*[[The Golden Bough/The King of the Wood|Chapter 1. The King of the Wood]]
-*''[[The Hero with a Thousand Faces]]''+*[[The Golden Bough/Priestly Kings|Chapter 2. Priestly Kings]]
-*[[The Mass of Saint-Secaire]]+*[[The Golden Bough/Sympathetic Magic|Chapter 3. Sympathetic Magic]]
-*[[Rex Nemorensis]]+*[[The Golden Bough/Magic and Religion|Chapter 4. Magic and Religion]]
-*[[The Seclusion of Girls at Puberty]]+*[[The Golden Bough/The Magical Control of the Weather|Chapter 5. The Magical Control of the Weather]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Magicians as Kings|Chapter 6. Magicians as Kings]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Incarnate Human Gods|Chapter 7. Incarnate Human Gods]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Departmental Kings of Nature|Chapter 8. Departmental Kings of Nature]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Worship of Trees|Chapter 9. The Worship of Trees]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Relics of Tree Worship in Modern Europe|Chapter 10. Relics of Tree Worship in Modern Europe]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Influence of the Sexes on Vegetation|Chapter 11. The Influence of the Sexes on Vegetation]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Sacred Marriage|Chapter 12. The Sacred Marriage]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Kings of Rome and Alba|Chapter 13. The Kings of Rome and Alba]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Succession to the Kingdom in Ancient Latium|Chapter 14. Succession to the Kingdom in Ancient Latium]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Worship of the Oak|Chapter 15. The Worship of the Oak]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Dianus and Diana|Chapter 16. Dianus and Diana]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Burden of Royalty|Chapter 17. The Burden of Royalty]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Perils of the Soul|Chapter 18. The Perils of the Soul]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Tabooed Acts|Chapter 19. Tabooed Acts]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Tabooed Persons|Chapter 20. Tabooed Persons]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Tabooed Things|Chapter 21. Tabooed Things]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Tabooed Words|Chapter 22. Tabooed Words]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Our Debt to the Savage|Chapter 23. Our Debt to the Savage]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Killing of the Divine King|Chapter 24. The Killing of the Divine King]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Temporary Kings|Chapter 25. Temporary Kings]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Sacrifice of the King’s Son|Chapter 26. Sacrifice of the King’s Son]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Succession to the Soul|Chapter 27. Succession to the Soul]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Killing of the Tree-Spirit|Chapter 28. The Killing of the Tree-Spirit]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Myth of Adonis|Chapter 29. The Myth of Adonis]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Adonis in Syria|Chapter 30. Adonis in Syria]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Adonis in Cyprus|Chapter 31. Adonis in Cyprus]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Ritual of Adonis|Chapter 32. The Ritual of Adonis]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Gardens of Adonis|Chapter 33. The Gardens of Adonis]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Myth and Ritual of Attis|Chapter 34. The Myth and Ritual of Attis]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Attis as a God of Vegetation|Chapter 35. Attis as a God of Vegetation]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Human Representatives of Attis|Chapter 36. Human Representatives of Attis]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Oriental Religions in the West|Chapter 37. Oriental Religions in the West]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Myth of Osiris|Chapter 38. The Myth of Osiris]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Ritual of Osiris|Chapter 39. The Ritual of Osiris]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Nature of Osiris|Chapter 40. The Nature of Osiris]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Isis|Chapter 41. Isis]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Osiris and the Sun|Chapter 42. Osiris and the Sun]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Dionysus|Chapter 43. Dionysus]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Demeter and Persephone|Chapter 44. Demeter and Persephone]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Corn-Mother and Corn-Maiden in N. Europe|Chapter 45. Corn-Mother and Corn-Maiden in N. Europe]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Corn-Mother in Many Lands|Chapter 46. Corn-Mother in Many Lands]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Lityerses|Chapter 47. Lityerses]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Corn-Spirit as an Animal|Chapter 48. The Corn-Spirit as an Animal]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Ancient Deities of Vegetation as Animals|Chapter 49. Ancient Deities of Vegetation as Animals]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Eating the God|Chapter 50. Eating the God]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Homeopathic Magic of a Flesh Diet|Chapter 51. Homeopathic Magic of a Flesh Diet]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Killing the Divine Animal|Chapter 52. Killing the Divine Animal]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Propitiation of Wild Animals By Hunters|Chapter 53. The Propitiation of Wild Animals By Hunters]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Types of Animal Sacrament|Chapter 54. Types of Animal Sacrament]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Transference of Evil|Chapter 55. The Transference of Evil]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Public Expulsion of Evils|Chapter 56. The Public Expulsion of Evils]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Public Scapegoats|Chapter 57. Public Scapegoats]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Human Scapegoats in Classical Antiquity|Chapter 58. Human Scapegoats in Classical Antiquity]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Killing the God in Mexico|Chapter 59. Killing the God in Mexico]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Between Heaven and Earth|Chapter 60. Between Heaven and Earth]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Myth of Balder|Chapter 61. The Myth of Balder]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Fire-Festivals of Europe|Chapter 62. The Fire-Festivals of Europe]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Interpretation of the Fire-Festivals|Chapter 63. The Interpretation of the Fire-Festivals]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Burning of Human Beings in the Fires|Chapter 64. The Burning of Human Beings in the Fires]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Balder and the Mistletoe|Chapter 65. Balder and the Mistletoe]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The External Soul in Folk-Tales|Chapter 66. The External Soul in Folk-Tales]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The External Soul in Folk-Custom|Chapter 67. The External Soul in Folk-Custom]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/The Golden Bough|Chapter 68. The Golden Bough]]
 +*[[The Golden Bough/Farewell to Nemi|Chapter 69. Farewell to Nemi]]
 +==See also==
 +:''[[The Golden Bough (mythology)]]''
 +
 +* [[Archetypal literary criticism]]
 +* [[Force-fire]]
 +* [[Not to Touch the Earth]]
 +* [[Rex Nemorensis]]
 +* [[Seclusion of girls at puberty]]
 +* ''[[The Hero with a Thousand Faces]]''
 +* [[The Mass of Saint-Secaire]]
 +* [[The Golden Bough (mythology)]]
 +* ''[[Totem and Taboo]]''
 +*[[The Golden Bough (J. M. W. Turner)]]
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Current revision

"THE PRIMARY aim of this book is to explain the remarkable rule which regulated the succession to the priesthood of Diana at Aricia."--The Golden Bough (1890) by James George Frazer

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion (retitled The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion in its second edition) is a wide-ranging, comparative study of mythology and religion, written by the Scottish anthropologist Sir James George Frazer (1854–1941). It was first published in two volumes in 1890; in three volumes in 1900; the third edition, published 1906–15, comprised twelve volumes. The work was aimed at a wide literate audience raised on tales as told in such publications as Thomas Bulfinch's The Age of Fable, or Stories of Gods and Heroes (1855).

Frazer offered a modernist approach to discussing religion, treating it dispassionately as a cultural phenomenon rather than from a theological perspective. The influence of The Golden Bough on contemporary European literature and thought was substantial.

The book scandalized the British public upon its first publication, because it included the Christian story of Jesus in its comparative study, thus inviting an agnostic reading of the Lamb of God as a relic of a pagan religion. Frazer removed his analysis of the Crucifixion to a speculative appendix for the third edition, and it was entirely missing from the single-volume abridged edition.

Contents

Subject matter

The Golden Bough attempts to define the shared elements of religious belief. Its thesis is that old religions were fertility cults that revolved around the worship of, and periodic sacrifice of, a sacred king.

This king was the incarnation of a dying and reviving god, a solar deity who underwent a mystic marriage to a goddess of the Earth, who died at the harvest, and was reincarnated in the spring. Frazer claims that this legend is central to almost all of the world's mythologies.

The germ for Frazer's thesis was the pre-Roman priest-king at the fane of Nemi, who was murdered ritually by his successor:

"When I first put pen to paper to write The Golden Bough I had no conception of the magnitude of the voyage on which I was embarking; I thought only to explain a single rule of an ancient Italian priesthood." (Aftermath p vi)

The book's title was taken from an incident in the Aeneid, illustrated by the British artist Joseph Mallord William Turner: Aeneas and the Sibyl present the golden bough to the gatekeeper of Hades in order to gain admission.

Reception

The book scandalized the British public upon its first publication, because it included the Christian story of Jesus in its comparative study, thus inviting an agnostic reading of the Lamb of God as a relic of a pagan religion. Frazer removed his analysis of the Crucifixion to a speculative appendix for the third edition, and it was entirely missing from the single-volume abridged edition.

Its influence on the emerging discipline of anthropology was pervasive and undeniable. For example, Bronisław Malinowski, stricken with tuberculosis shortly after receiving his doctorate in physics and mathematics, read Frazer's work in the original English to distract himself from his illness. "No sooner had I read this great work than I became immersed in it and enslaved by it. I realized then that anthropology, as presented by Sir James Frazer, is a great science, worthy of as much devotion as any of her elder and more exact studies and I became bound to the service of Frazerian anthropology."

Despite whatever controversy the work may have generated, and its critical reception amongst other scholars, The Golden Bough had a tremendous effect on the literature of the period. Robert Graves adapted Frazer's concept of the dying king who is sacrificed for the good of the kingdom to the romantic idea of the poet's necessary suffering for the sake of his Muse-Goddess in his Frazer-esque book on poetry, rituals, and myths, The White Goddess, which was published in 1948. William Butler Yeats makes reference to it in his poem, "Sailing to Byzantium". H. P. Lovecraft mentions the book in his short story "The Call of Cthulhu". T. S. Eliot acknowledged indebtedness to Frazer in his first note to his poem The Waste Land. William Carlos Williams references it as well in Book Two, part two, of his extended poem in five books, Paterson. James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway, D. H. Lawrence, Aleister Crowley, Ezra Pound, Mary Renault, Joseph Campbell, Naomi Mitchison (in her The Corn King and the Spring Queen), and Camille Paglia are but a few authors deeply influenced by The Golden Bough. Its literary impact has given it continued life, even as its direct influence in anthropology has waned.

Critical analysis

The philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein returned time and again to The Golden Bough, so much so that his commentaries have been compiled as Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, edited by Rush Rhees, originally published in 1967 (the English edition followed in 1971). He writes, "Frazer is much more savage than most of these savages." Weston LaBarre observed that Frazer was "the last of the scholastics" and wrote The Golden Bough "as an extended footnote to a line in Virgil he felt he did not understand."

Some modern critics set Frazer in the broader context of the history of ideas, for example, Robert Ackerman in his The Myth and Ritual School: J. G. Frazer and the Cambridge Ritualists. The myth and ritual school includes scholars Jane Harrison, Gilbert Murray, F. M. Cornford, and A.B. Cook, who were connecting the new discipline of myth theory and anthropology with traditional literary classics at the end of the nineteenth century. This school was an important influence on much Modernist literature.

Quotations

"If the test of truth lay in a show of hands or a counting of heads, the system of magic might appeal, with far more reason than the Catholic Church, to the proud motto, Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus ["Always, everywhere, and by all"], as the sure and certain credential of its own infallibility." (Chapter 4, "Magic and Religion".)

"The danger, however, is not less real because it is imaginary; imagination acts upon man as really as does gravitation, and may kill him as certainly as a dose of prussic acid." (Chapter 21, "Tabooed Things".)

In popular culture

TOC

Contents


See also

The Golden Bough (mythology)




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "The Golden Bough" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools