Thematic literary criticism
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 19:13, 16 August 2007 WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) (→See also) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 19:13, 16 August 2007 WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) (→See also) Next diff → |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| *''[[The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations]]'' | *''[[The Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations]]'' | ||
| - | *[[Aarne-Thompson]] | + | *[[Morphology (folkloristics)]] |
| *[[Archetypal literary criticism]]{{GFDL}} | *[[Archetypal literary criticism]]{{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 19:13, 16 August 2007
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
In the course of 2004-2006 I have read a number of works which can be considered thematic literatery criticism:
- Praz’s Romantic Agony
- Todorov’s The Fantastic
- Colin Wilson’s The Misfits and The Outsider
- Ludwig Marcuse’s Obscene
- André Breton’s Anthology of Black Humor
- Patrick J. Kearney's A History of Erotic Literature
Todo list: the thematic criticism of Jean-Pierre Richard (Littérature et Sensation, 1954) and the Geneva school as it applies to the works above. Also check the criticism by Todorov on Richard.
Maybe start here; a tribute to Horst Daemmrich's Themes and Motifs in Western Literature.
See also
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Thematic literary criticism" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
