De generibus et speciebus
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Revision as of 12:20, 7 May 2018 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 12:24, 7 May 2018 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
In the ''[[Isagoge]]'' of Porphyry, translated by [[Boethius]], which until the thirteenth century was the common text-book of logic in the schools, the following passage occurs: Mox de generibus et speciebus, illud quidem . | In the ''[[Isagoge]]'' of Porphyry, translated by [[Boethius]], which until the thirteenth century was the common text-book of logic in the schools, the following passage occurs: Mox de generibus et speciebus, illud quidem . | ||
- | + | <hr> | |
+ | "I shall omit to speak about [[genera and species]], as to whether they subsist (in the nature of things) or in mere conceptions only; whether also if subsistent, they are bodies or incorporeal, and whether they are separate from, or in, sensibles, and subsist about these, for such a treatise is most profound, and requires another more extensive investigation". --[[Porphyry (philosopher)|Porphyry]] on the [[problem of universals]] in the ''[[Isagoge]]'', translation by [[Boethius]], English translation quoted in ''[[A History of Western Philosophy (McInerny and Caponigri)]]'', p. 357, [[Ralph McInerny]], [[Aloysius Robert Caponigri]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Template}} | {{Template}} |
Revision as of 12:24, 7 May 2018
"Thus "Socratitus" is merely an accident of the substance "humanitas," or, as it is put by the author of the treatise De generibus et speciebus," Man is a species, a thing essentially one (res una essentialiter), which receives certain forms which make it Socrates." --EB1911[1] In the Isagoge of Porphyry, translated by Boethius, which until the thirteenth century was the common text-book of logic in the schools, the following passage occurs: Mox de generibus et speciebus, illud quidem . "I shall omit to speak about genera and species, as to whether they subsist (in the nature of things) or in mere conceptions only; whether also if subsistent, they are bodies or incorporeal, and whether they are separate from, or in, sensibles, and subsist about these, for such a treatise is most profound, and requires another more extensive investigation". --Porphyry on the problem of universals in the Isagoge, translation by Boethius, English translation quoted in A History of Western Philosophy (McInerny and Caponigri), p. 357, Ralph McInerny, Aloysius Robert Caponigri |
Related e |
Featured: |
"De generibus et speciebus" (English: "Of genera and species" or “Of Generals and Specifics”, thirteenth century) is an anonymous medieval work of philosophy on nominalism and realism. It was for a long time wrongly attributed to Abelard by Victor Cousin.
Fragment:
- "Nam cum habeat eorum sententia, nihil esse praeter individua"
See also
- Genus–differentia definition
- Genus
- Species
- Roscelin
- History of Medieval Philosophy by Maurice De Wulf