De generibus et speciebus
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Revision as of 14:58, 3 May 2018 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| style="text-align: left;" | | | style="text-align: left;" | | ||
"Thus "Socratitus" is merely an accident of the substance "humanitas," or, as it is put by the author of the treatise ''[[De generibus et speciebus]]''," Man is a species, a thing essentially one (res una essentialiter), which receives certain forms which make it Socrates." --[[EB1911]][https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:EB1911_-_Volume_24.djvu/368] | "Thus "Socratitus" is merely an accident of the substance "humanitas," or, as it is put by the author of the treatise ''[[De generibus et speciebus]]''," Man is a species, a thing essentially one (res una essentialiter), which receives certain forms which make it Socrates." --[[EB1911]][https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:EB1911_-_Volume_24.djvu/368] | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | "In the ''[[Isagoge]]'' of Porphyry, translated by [[Boethius]], which until the thirteenth century was the common text-book of logic in the schools, the following passage occurs: Mox [[de generibus et speciebus]], illud quidem." --Sholem Stein | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | "I shall omit to speak about [[genera and species]], as to whether they subsist (in the nature of things) or in mere conceptions only; whether also if subsistent, they are bodies or incorporeal, and whether they are separate from, or in, sensibles, and subsist about these, for such a treatise is most profound, and requires another more extensive investigation". --[[Porphyry (philosopher)|Porphyry]] on the [[problem of universals]] in the ''[[Isagoge]]'', translation by [[Boethius]], English translation quoted in ''[[A History of Western Philosophy (McInerny and Caponigri)]]'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
- | "[[De generibus et speciebus]]" (English: "Of genera and species" or “Of Generals and Specifics”, thirteenth century) is an anonymous medieval work of philosophy on [[nominalism and realism]]. It was for a long time wrongly attributed to [[Abelard]] by [[Victor Cousin]]. | + | "[[De generibus et speciebus]]" (English: "Of genera and species" or “Of Generals and Specifics”, thirteenth century) is an anonymous medieval work of philosophy on [[nominalism and realism]]. It was for a long time erroneously attributed to [[Abelard]] by [[Victor Cousin]]. |
Line 11: | Line 15: | ||
:"Nam cum habeat eorum sententia, nihil esse praeter individua" | :"Nam cum habeat eorum sententia, nihil esse praeter individua" | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
+ | *[[Genus–differentia definition ]] | ||
*[[Genus]] | *[[Genus]] | ||
*[[Species]] | *[[Species]] | ||
*[[Roscelin]] | *[[Roscelin]] | ||
+ | *[[History of Medieval Philosophy]] by Maurice De Wulf | ||
{{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} |
Current revision
"Thus "Socratitus" is merely an accident of the substance "humanitas," or, as it is put by the author of the treatise De generibus et speciebus," Man is a species, a thing essentially one (res una essentialiter), which receives certain forms which make it Socrates." --EB1911[1] "In the Isagoge of Porphyry, translated by Boethius, which until the thirteenth century was the common text-book of logic in the schools, the following passage occurs: Mox de generibus et speciebus, illud quidem." --Sholem Stein "I shall omit to speak about genera and species, as to whether they subsist (in the nature of things) or in mere conceptions only; whether also if subsistent, they are bodies or incorporeal, and whether they are separate from, or in, sensibles, and subsist about these, for such a treatise is most profound, and requires another more extensive investigation". --Porphyry on the problem of universals in the Isagoge, translation by Boethius, English translation quoted in A History of Western Philosophy (McInerny and Caponigri) |
Related e |
Featured: |
"De generibus et speciebus" (English: "Of genera and species" or “Of Generals and Specifics”, thirteenth century) is an anonymous medieval work of philosophy on nominalism and realism. It was for a long time erroneously attributed to Abelard by Victor Cousin.
Fragment:
- "Nam cum habeat eorum sententia, nihil esse praeter individua"
See also
- Genus–differentia definition
- Genus
- Species
- Roscelin
- History of Medieval Philosophy by Maurice De Wulf