School of Resentment
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
| Revision as of 07:51, 19 July 2007 WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 07:51, 19 July 2007 WikiSysop (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| is a term coined by [[Harold Bloom]] to collectively group together [[multicultural]] [[literary criticism]], such as [[African American]], [[marxist]], and [[feminist]] criticism. | is a term coined by [[Harold Bloom]] to collectively group together [[multicultural]] [[literary criticism]], such as [[African American]], [[marxist]], and [[feminist]] criticism. | ||
| - | He outlines this term in his introduction to ''[[The Western Canon]]'' (1994), in which he claims that his purpose is distinguished from political motives and that he wants to have literature judged [[art for art's sake|purely on aesthetic values]]. Bloom has no problem discussing the social and political issues in books, but he disapproves of how various ideologies have overtaken English departments and are only interested in their own political motives, not aesthetic or literary worth. In his work he defends the [[Western canon|Canon]] from this collective group, which he believes want to break down the [[Western canon|Canon]] so that they can insert inferior literary works that support their own political motives. The “School of Resentment” is usually defined as scholars who wish to enlarge the canon by adding more minority, political or female authors whether or not their writing is considered to be aesthetically worthy of being included. Bloom feels that such an opening threatens the nature of the canon and will lead to its eventual demise. Although his attacks on the School of Resentment often lead people to assume Bloom himself is racist or sexist, it should be noted that his own list of The Western Canon includes a large number of women writers, ethnic writers and writers from non-Western countries. | + | He outlines this term in his introduction to ''[[The Western Canon]]'' (1994), in which he claims that his purpose is distinguished from political motives and that he wants to have literature judged [[art for art's sake|purely on aesthetic values]]. Bloom has no problem discussing the social and political issues in books, but he disapproves of how various ideologies have overtaken English departments and are only interested in their own political motives, not aesthetic or [[literary merit]]. In his work he defends the [[Western canon|Canon]] from this collective group, which he believes want to break down the [[Western canon|Canon]] so that they can insert inferior literary works that support their own political motives. The “School of Resentment” is usually defined as scholars who wish to enlarge the canon by adding more minority, political or female authors whether or not their writing is considered to be aesthetically worthy of being included. Bloom feels that such an opening threatens the nature of the canon and will lead to its eventual demise. Although his attacks on the School of Resentment often lead people to assume Bloom himself is racist or sexist, it should be noted that his own list of The Western Canon includes a large number of women writers, ethnic writers and writers from non-Western countries. |
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 07:51, 19 July 2007
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
is a term coined by Harold Bloom to collectively group together multicultural literary criticism, such as African American, marxist, and feminist criticism.
He outlines this term in his introduction to The Western Canon (1994), in which he claims that his purpose is distinguished from political motives and that he wants to have literature judged purely on aesthetic values. Bloom has no problem discussing the social and political issues in books, but he disapproves of how various ideologies have overtaken English departments and are only interested in their own political motives, not aesthetic or literary merit. In his work he defends the Canon from this collective group, which he believes want to break down the Canon so that they can insert inferior literary works that support their own political motives. The “School of Resentment” is usually defined as scholars who wish to enlarge the canon by adding more minority, political or female authors whether or not their writing is considered to be aesthetically worthy of being included. Bloom feels that such an opening threatens the nature of the canon and will lead to its eventual demise. Although his attacks on the School of Resentment often lead people to assume Bloom himself is racist or sexist, it should be noted that his own list of The Western Canon includes a large number of women writers, ethnic writers and writers from non-Western countries.
