Distinction (philosophy)
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
| Revision as of 22:18, 16 June 2013 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 19:24, 5 November 2020 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| - | '''Distinction''', the fundamental philosophical [[abstraction]], involves the recognition of difference. | + | '''Distinction''',a the fundamental philosophical [[abstraction]], involves the recognition of difference. |
| + | there were various ways in which things could be distinguished. The merely logical or virtual distinction, such as the difference between concavity and convexity, involves the mental apprehension of two definitions, but which cannot be realized outside the mind, as any concave line would be a convex line considered from another perspective. A real distinction involves a level of [[Ontology|ontological]] separation, as when squirrels are distinguished from llamas (for no squirrel is a llama, and no llama is a squirrel). A real distinction is thus different than a merely conceptual one, in that in a real distinction, one of the terms can be realized in reality without the other being realized. | ||
| - | [[Cybernetics]] deals with the rational paradox of [[self-reference]] by distinguishing it from hetero-reference in the abstract distinction. Prefacing the distinction comes the '[[proemial relation]]' (a term coined by [[Gotthard Gunther]] in his 1970 paper "Cognition and Volition") between [[subjectivity]] and [[profundity]] which, by the mark of distinction, become distinguished. | + | Later developments include [[Duns Scotus|Duns Scotus's]] [[formal distinction]], which developed in part out of the recognition in previous authors that there need to be an intermediary between logical and real distinctions. |
| - | [[George Spencer-Brown]]'s calculus of indication (see the ''[[Laws of Form]]'') starts with the injunction "Draw a distinction". The consequences of this primordial actuality include all given [[dimensionality]] and [[time]]. | + | Some relevant distinctions to the history of Western philosophy include: |
| + | * [[Contingency (philosophy)|Necessity and contingency]] | ||
| + | * [[Inductive reasoning|Inductive]] and [[Deductive reasoning|Deductive]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Distinctions in contemporary thought == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === [[Analytic–synthetic distinction]] === | ||
| + | While there are anticipation of this distinction prior to Kant in the British [[Empiricism|Empiricists]] (and even further in [[Scholasticism|Scholastic]] thought), it was Kant who introduced the terminology. The distinction concerns the relation of a subject to its predicate: analytic claims are those in which the subject contains the predicate, as in "All bodies are extended." Synthetic claims bring two concepts together, as in "All events are caused." The distinction was recently called into question by [[Willard Van Orman Quine|W.V.O. Quine]], in his paper "[[Two Dogmas of Empiricism]]." | ||
| + | |||
| + | === [[A priori and a posteriori|''A priori'' and ''a posteriori'']] === | ||
| + | The origins of the distinction are less clear, and it concerns the origins of [[knowledge]]. ''A posteriori'' knowledge arises from, or is caused by, experience. ''A priori'' knowledge may come temporally after experience, but its certainty is not derivable from the experience itself. [[Saul Kripke]] was the first major thinker to propose that there are analytic ''a posteriori'' knowledge claims. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Notable distinctions in historical authors == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Aristotle === | ||
| + | [[Aristotle]] makes the distinction between [[Potentiality and actuality|actuality and potentiality]]. Actuality is a realization of the way a thing could be, while potency refers simply to the way a thing could be. There are two levels to each: matter itself can be anything, and becomes something actually by [[Four causes|causes]], making it something which then has the ability to be in a certain way, and that ability can then be realized. The matter of an ax can be an ax, then is made into an ax. The ax thereby is able to cut, and reaches a new form of actuality in actually cutting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Aquinas === | ||
| + | The major distinction [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas]] makes is that of [[essence]] and [[existence]]. It is a distinction already in [[Avicenna]], but Aquinas maps the distinction onto the actuality/potentiality distinction of Aristotle, such that the essence of a thing is in potency to the existence of a thing, which is that thing's actuality. | ||
| + | === Kant === | ||
| + | In [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]], the distinction between appearance and thing-in-itself is foundational to his entire philosophical project. | ||
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 5 November 2020
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
Distinction,a the fundamental philosophical abstraction, involves the recognition of difference.
there were various ways in which things could be distinguished. The merely logical or virtual distinction, such as the difference between concavity and convexity, involves the mental apprehension of two definitions, but which cannot be realized outside the mind, as any concave line would be a convex line considered from another perspective. A real distinction involves a level of ontological separation, as when squirrels are distinguished from llamas (for no squirrel is a llama, and no llama is a squirrel). A real distinction is thus different than a merely conceptual one, in that in a real distinction, one of the terms can be realized in reality without the other being realized.
Later developments include Duns Scotus's formal distinction, which developed in part out of the recognition in previous authors that there need to be an intermediary between logical and real distinctions.
Some relevant distinctions to the history of Western philosophy include:
Contents |
Distinctions in contemporary thought
Analytic–synthetic distinction
While there are anticipation of this distinction prior to Kant in the British Empiricists (and even further in Scholastic thought), it was Kant who introduced the terminology. The distinction concerns the relation of a subject to its predicate: analytic claims are those in which the subject contains the predicate, as in "All bodies are extended." Synthetic claims bring two concepts together, as in "All events are caused." The distinction was recently called into question by W.V.O. Quine, in his paper "Two Dogmas of Empiricism."
A priori and a posteriori
The origins of the distinction are less clear, and it concerns the origins of knowledge. A posteriori knowledge arises from, or is caused by, experience. A priori knowledge may come temporally after experience, but its certainty is not derivable from the experience itself. Saul Kripke was the first major thinker to propose that there are analytic a posteriori knowledge claims.
Notable distinctions in historical authors
Aristotle
Aristotle makes the distinction between actuality and potentiality. Actuality is a realization of the way a thing could be, while potency refers simply to the way a thing could be. There are two levels to each: matter itself can be anything, and becomes something actually by causes, making it something which then has the ability to be in a certain way, and that ability can then be realized. The matter of an ax can be an ax, then is made into an ax. The ax thereby is able to cut, and reaches a new form of actuality in actually cutting.
Aquinas
The major distinction Aquinas makes is that of essence and existence. It is a distinction already in Avicenna, but Aquinas maps the distinction onto the actuality/potentiality distinction of Aristotle, such that the essence of a thing is in potency to the existence of a thing, which is that thing's actuality.
Kant
In Kant, the distinction between appearance and thing-in-itself is foundational to his entire philosophical project.
