Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 11:21, 22 May 2021
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 11:43, 22 May 2021
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 5: Line 5:
The work has recently attracted the attention of scholars for its views on the study of [[magic (supernatural)|magic]], [[religion]] and [[natural science]]. Lévi sees magic in between science and religion and believes it serves a potential conciliatory or mediating function between the two views. Lévi rejects views, such as [[Edward Burnett Tylor|E. B. Taylor's]], that magic or religion is inherently irrational and has been superseded by modern science. Instead he posits magic as an "esoteric science" and suggests that [[Hermeticism]] could be adapted to find the underlying truth behind all magical systems, calling for a "comparative magic." Levi thus posits a type of [[Perennial philosophy|Perennialism]] buttressed by [[comparative theology]] and [[comparative religion]], anticipating modern-day [[religious studies]] and paralleling contemporary comparative projects in [[anthropology]] and [[philology]] such as the work of [[Max Müller]]. The work has recently attracted the attention of scholars for its views on the study of [[magic (supernatural)|magic]], [[religion]] and [[natural science]]. Lévi sees magic in between science and religion and believes it serves a potential conciliatory or mediating function between the two views. Lévi rejects views, such as [[Edward Burnett Tylor|E. B. Taylor's]], that magic or religion is inherently irrational and has been superseded by modern science. Instead he posits magic as an "esoteric science" and suggests that [[Hermeticism]] could be adapted to find the underlying truth behind all magical systems, calling for a "comparative magic." Levi thus posits a type of [[Perennial philosophy|Perennialism]] buttressed by [[comparative theology]] and [[comparative religion]], anticipating modern-day [[religious studies]] and paralleling contemporary comparative projects in [[anthropology]] and [[philology]] such as the work of [[Max Müller]].
- +==Transcendental Magic, its Doctrine and Ritual (1896) [https://archive.org/stream/transcendentalma00leviuoft/transcendentalma00leviuoft_djvu.txt]==
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 11:43, 22 May 2021

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (Dogma and Ritual of High Magic) is the title of Éliphas Lévi's first published treatise on ritual magic, which appeared in two volumes between 1854 (Dogme) and 1856 (Rituel). The work is structured into 22 chapters, which parallel the Tarot.

Lévi's Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie was translated into English by Arthur Edward Waite as Transcendental Magic, its Doctrine and Ritual (1896). Waite added a biographical preface and footnotes. A revised edition of this translation was published in 1923.

The work has recently attracted the attention of scholars for its views on the study of magic, religion and natural science. Lévi sees magic in between science and religion and believes it serves a potential conciliatory or mediating function between the two views. Lévi rejects views, such as E. B. Taylor's, that magic or religion is inherently irrational and has been superseded by modern science. Instead he posits magic as an "esoteric science" and suggests that Hermeticism could be adapted to find the underlying truth behind all magical systems, calling for a "comparative magic." Levi thus posits a type of Perennialism buttressed by comparative theology and comparative religion, anticipating modern-day religious studies and paralleling contemporary comparative projects in anthropology and philology such as the work of Max Müller.

Transcendental Magic, its Doctrine and Ritual (1896) [1]




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools