The Pornographic Imagination  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 11:20, 23 February 2008
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 23:29, 9 January 2012
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 13: Line 13:
== Bataille understood more clearly than any other writer == == Bataille understood more clearly than any other writer ==
-:''One reason that ''[[Histoire de l'oeil]]'' and ''[[Madame Edwarda]]'' make such a strong and unsettling impression is that Bataille understood more clearly than any other writer I know of that what pornography is really about, ultimately, isn't sex but death. I am not suggesting that every pornographic work speaks, either overtly or covertly, of death. Only works dealing with that specific and sharpest inflection of the themes of lust, "the obscene," do. It's toward the gratifications of death, succeeding and surpassing those of eros, that every truly obscene quest tends.'' --Susan Sontag in the ''Pornographic Imagination'' via ''Styles of Radical Will'' p. 60, Picador USA+:''One reason that ''[[Histoire de l'oeil]]'' and ''[[Madame Edwarda]]'' make such a strong and unsettling impression is that Bataille understood more clearly than any other writer I know of that what pornography is really about, ultimately, isn't sex but death. I am not suggesting that every pornographic work speaks, either overtly or covertly, of death. Only works dealing with that specific and sharpest inflection of the themes of lust, "the obscene," do. It's toward the gratifications of death, succeeding and surpassing those of eros, that every truly obscene quest tends.'' -- p. 60, Picador USA
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 23:29, 9 January 2012

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

The Pornographic Imagination is a nobrow essay by Susan Sontag first published in book form in Styles of Radical Will. It had been originally published two years earlier in the Partisan Review of spring 1967.

The subject is erotic literature and Sontag contends that five French literary works are not 'just' pornography but literary fiction and thus genuine literature. Although the term paraliterature had not been coined at the time of its writing (we have to wait 17 years for Fredric Jameson to do that), the connection between science fiction and erotic fiction makes this essay one of the first defenses of the nobrow or paraliterary category.

Her 'case' is based on these five novels:

Bataille understood more clearly than any other writer

One reason that Histoire de l'oeil and Madame Edwarda make such a strong and unsettling impression is that Bataille understood more clearly than any other writer I know of that what pornography is really about, ultimately, isn't sex but death. I am not suggesting that every pornographic work speaks, either overtly or covertly, of death. Only works dealing with that specific and sharpest inflection of the themes of lust, "the obscene," do. It's toward the gratifications of death, succeeding and surpassing those of eros, that every truly obscene quest tends. -- p. 60, Picador USA




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "The Pornographic Imagination" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools