Symbolism (Taschen)
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
Symbolism is an art history book first published by Taschen in 1999, edited by Gilles Néret and written by Michael Gibson. It deals with the art movement known as Symbolism.
It is crammed with high quality reproductions of wonderful pictures by a wide variety of artists who are ignored by art history. Leon Spilliaert, Ciurlionis, Alberto Martini, Bruno Schulz, Kubin, Max Klinger, Bocklin, Wiertz, Rops, Moreau, Ensor, Groux, and Keller. It makes connections between Symbolism and modern art, and has those symbolist pictures by artists who later turned to abstraction, Mondrian, Kupka, Kandinsky, and at the features Duchamp's "Given", Max Ernst's "Robing of the Bride", De Chirico and Delvaux. The book begins with Goya, Blake and Fuseli.
From the publisher:
- A key movement in modern art "To clothe the idea in perceptible form," proposed the poet Jean Moréas in his 1886 Manifesto of Symbolism. It was in France and Belgium, the cradles of literary Symbolism, that Symbolist painting was born. It plunged headlong into the cultural space opened up by the poetry of Baudelaire and Mallarmé and by the operas of Wagner. Symbolist painters sought not to represent appearances but to express "the Idea," and the imaginary therefore plays an important part in their work. "Dream" was their credo; they execrated, with a fanatical hatred, impressionism, realism, naturalism, and the scientistic. The main principle of Symbolism, that of "correspondences," was to attain harmony between all the different arts, or even to realise the total work of art (Gesamtkunstwerk) that Wagner had dreamt of creating. What we rediscover today, after a period of neglect, is this: Symbolist painting is essential to our understanding of modern art, not only because it spread across the world like wildfire, creating disciples from Russia to the United States, from Northern Europe to the Mediterranean, but because it was the source of a series of mutations without which modern art would not be what it is.
