Aristotelian natural philosophy
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 19:10, 18 August 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{Template}} | + | #Redirect [[Aristotelianism]] |
| - | + | ||
| - | The [[Catholic]] doctrine of the [[resurrection of the body]] states that at the [[second coming]], the souls of the departed will be reunited with their bodies as a whole person (substance) and witness to the [[apocalypse]]. The thorough consistency between dogma and [[Aristotelian natural philosophy]] was maintained here in part from a serious attendance to the principle that there can be only one truth. Consistency with science, logic, philosophy, and faith remained a high priority for centuries, and a university doctorate in theology generally included the entire science curriculum as a prerequisite. This doctrine is not universally accepted by Christians today. Many believe that one's immortal soul goes directly to [[Heaven]] upon death of the body. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===Descartes and his disciples=== | + | |
| - | In his ''[[Meditations on First Philosophy]]'', [[René Descartes|Descartes]] embarked upon a quest in which he called all his previous beliefs into doubt, in order to find out of what he could be certain. In so doing, he discovered that he could doubt whether he had a body (it could be that he was dreaming of it or that it was an illusion created by an evil demon), but he could not doubt whether he had a mind. This gave Descartes his first inkling that the mind and body were different things. The mind, according to Descartes, was a "thinking thing" (lat. ''res cogitans''), and an immaterial [[Substance theory|substance]]. This "thing" was the essence of himself, that which doubts, believes, hopes, and thinks. The distinction between mind and body is argued in Meditation VI as follows: I have a clear and distinct idea of myself as a thinking, non-extended thing, and a clear and distinct idea of body as an extended and non-thinking thing. Whatever I can conceive clearly and distinctly, God can so create. So, Descartes argues, the mind, a thinking thing, can exist apart from its extended body. And therefore, the mind is a substance distinct from the body, a substance whose essence is thought. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The central claim of what is often called ''Cartesian dualism'', in honor of Descartes, is that the immaterial mind and the material body, while being [[ontology|ontologically]] distinct substances, causally interact. This is an idea that continues to feature prominently in many non-European philosophies. Mental events cause physical events, and vice-versa. But this leads to a substantial problem for Cartesian dualism: How can an immaterial mind cause anything in a material body, and vice-versa? This has often been called the "problem of interactionism." | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Descartes himself struggled to come up with a feasible answer to this problem. In his letter to [[Elisabeth of Bohemia, Princess Palatine]], he suggested that animal spirits interacted with the body through the [[pineal gland]], a small gland in the centre of the [[brain]], between the two [[Cerebral hemispheres|hemispheres]] The term "Cartesian dualism" is also often associated with this more specific notion of causal interaction through the pineal gland. However, this explanation was not satisfactory: ''how'' can an immaterial mind interact with the physical pineal gland? Because Descartes' was such a difficult theory to defend, some of his disciples, such as [[Arnold Geulincx]] and [[Nicholas Malebranche]], proposed a different explanation: That all mind–body interactions required the direct intervention of [[God]]. According to these philosophers, the appropriate states of mind and body were only the ''occasions'' for such intervention, not real causes. These [[occasionalism|occasionalists]] maintained the strong thesis that all causation was directly dependent on God, instead of holding that all causation was natural except for that between mind and body. | + | |
| - | ==See also== | + | |
| - | * [[Nondualism]] | + | |
| - | * [[Yanantin]] | + | |
| - | * [[Bipartite (theology)]] | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{GFDL}} | + | |
Current revision
- Redirect Aristotelianism
