In Defence of Realism
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Revision as of 17:34, 26 November 2019 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 17:48, 26 November 2019 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| style="text-align: left;" | | | style="text-align: left;" | | ||
“A bracing counterblast to the post-modernizing gibberish of contemporary [[literary theory]].” — [[The Spectator]] | “A bracing counterblast to the post-modernizing gibberish of contemporary [[literary theory]].” — [[The Spectator]] | ||
+ | <hr> | ||
+ | "giants of contemporary fiction - Beckett, Pynchon, Barthelme, Borges and Marquez, to name a few - are committed to the creation of non-worlds, dream-worlds, word-worlds or anti-worlds." --page 2 | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} | ||
{{Template}} | {{Template}} |
Revision as of 17:48, 26 November 2019
“A bracing counterblast to the post-modernizing gibberish of contemporary literary theory.” — The Spectator "giants of contemporary fiction - Beckett, Pynchon, Barthelme, Borges and Marquez, to name a few - are committed to the creation of non-worlds, dream-worlds, word-worlds or anti-worlds." --page 2 |
Related e |
Featured: |
In Defence of Realism (1998) is a book by Raymond Tallis with criticism of postmodernism.
Blurb:
In Defence of Realism is a powerful indictment of the fog of bad philosophy and worse linguistics that has shrouded much contemporary literary theory and criticism. Raymond Tallis, one of the most important critics of post-Saussurean literary theory in the English-speaking world, examines the reasons often cited by critics and theorists for believing that realism in fiction is impossible and verisimilitude a mere literary “effect.” He trenchantly shows not only that the arguments of critics hostile to realism are invalid, but that even if they were sound, they would apply equally to anti-realist fiction, indeed to all intelligible discourse.