Free will  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 15:07, 11 January 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 14:37, 27 December 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)
(See also)
Next diff →
Line 41: Line 41:
*[[Shoehorn#Turn of phrase|Shoehorn]] *[[Shoehorn#Turn of phrase|Shoehorn]]
*[[Voluntarism (metaphysics)]] *[[Voluntarism (metaphysics)]]
 +
 +* [[Argument from free will]] (the argument that free will and an omniscient God are incompatible)
 +* [[Buridan's ass]]
 +* [[De libero arbitrio (Augustine)|De libero arbitrio]] – early treatise about the freedom of will by Augustine of Hippo
 +* [[Dilemma of determinism]]
 +* [[Free will in antiquity]]
 +* [[Free will theorem]]
 +* [[Free will in theology]]
 +* [[Mental causation]]
 +* [[Moral responsibility]]
 +* [[Naturalism (philosophy)]]
 +* ''[[On the Freedom of the Will]]''; an essay presented to the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences in 1839 by Arthur Schopenhauer
 +* [[Prevenient grace]]
 +* [[Problem of future contingents]]
 +* [[Responsibility assumption]]
 +* [[Subject–object problem]]
 +* [[Voluntarism (metaphysics)]]
 +* [[Agency (LDS Church)]]
 +
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 14:37, 27 December 2014

"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains." --The Social Contract [...]
This page Free will is part of the politics series.Illustration:Liberty Leading the People (1831, detail) by Eugène Delacroix.
Enlarge
This page Free will is part of the politics series.
Illustration:Liberty Leading the People (1831, detail) by Eugène Delacroix.

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

The question of free will is whether, and in what sense, rational agents exercise control over their actions and decisions. Addressing this question requires understanding the relation between freedom and cause, and determining whether or not the laws of nature are causally deterministic. The various philosophical positions taken differ on whether all events are determined or not—determinism versus indeterminism—and also on whether freedom can coexist with determinism or not—compatibilism versus incompatibilism. So, for instance, hard determinists argue that the universe is deterministic, and that this makes free will impossible.

The principle of free will has religious, ethical, and scientific implications. For example, in the religious realm, free will may imply that an omnipotent divinity does not assert its power over individual will and choices. In ethics, it may imply that individuals can be held morally accountable for their actions. In the scientific realm, it may imply that the actions of the body, including the brain and the mind, are not wholly determined by physical causality. The question of free will has been a central issue since the beginning of philosophical thought.

Arthur Schopenhauer put the puzzle of free will and moral responsibility in these terms:

Everyone believes himself a priori to be perfectly free, even in his individual actions, and thinks that at every moment he can commence another manner of life. ... But a posteriori, through experience, he finds to his astonishment that he is not free, but subjected to necessity, that in spite of all his resolutions and reflections he does not change his conduct, and that from the beginning of his life to the end of it, he must carry out the very character which he himself condemns...

In his On the Freedom of the Will, Schopenhauer stated, "You can do what you will, but in any given moment of your life you can will only one definite thing and absolutely nothing other than that one thing."

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Free will" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools