Fantasy or fantastique?  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Wiki Commons
Tumblr
Wikisource
YouTube
Shop


Featured:
A Scheme for abolishing all Words is one of the wittiest and smartest comments on semantics. (Illustration: extreme close-up from the movie "The Big Swallow" (1901), produced and directed by James Williamson (1855-1933)
Enlarge
A Scheme for abolishing all Words is one of the wittiest and smartest comments on semantics. (Illustration: extreme close-up from the movie "The Big Swallow" (1901), produced and directed by James Williamson (1855-1933)
fantasy fiction, fantastic literature, fantastique, The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre
In common parlance, fantasy is relegated to the works of Tolkien et al, this wiki prefers the fantastique.
Key critics of fantastic literature such as Rosemary Jackson, Christine Brooke-Rose, and Tzvetan Todorov all see Tolkien as beyond their parameters. Jackson’s work is largely concerned with fantasy elements within realist literature, while Todorov and Brooke-Rose see Tolkien as a creator of secondary worlds, no longer a fantasy writer, but a creator of the marvellous, placing him outside their studies. –-Sara Upstone

Although both the terms fantasy and fantastique are derived from the word fantasy, each term is used in English to denote a different sensibility in literature. Fantasy is generally held to be more based on logical worldbuilding typical for British analytic philosophy, and fantastique is more connected with ambiguities of continental postmodernism.

Bibliography

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Fantasy or fantastique?" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on original research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools