Death of the novel
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
|
Related e |
|
Wikipedia
Featured:  |
The death of the novel is a commonplace of discussion of literary fiction. According to Kathleen Fitzpatrick The novel has been dead for nearly as long as it has been alive. Jay McInerney in 2005 wrote that Twenty years ago, it was common knowledge in American publishing circles that the novel was over. In other words the idea that the form of literary novels has been exhausted is itself not very new. José Ortega y Gasset was writing on the Decline of the Novel, in 1925. Walter Benjamin in 1930 wrote a review of a novel of Alfred Döblin under the title Krisis des Romans (Crisis of the Novel)
Those contributing to the discussion have included Gore Vidal (from the 1950s onwards, initially inveighing against the nouveau roman), Roland Barthes (The Death of the Author) and the general anti-humanist tenor of poststructuralism, and John Barth. Ronald Sukenick wrote the story The Death of the Novel in 1969.
Tom Wolfe in the 1970s predicted that the New Journalism would displace the novel. V. S. Naipaul has pronounced the death of the novel. A polemic essay by David Foster Wallace connected the 'death of the novel' discussion with the mortality of the post-war generation of American novelists.
As for causes, Robert B. Pippin connects the 'death of the novel' with many other themes around nihilism in European culture. Saul Bellow, discussing Ravelstein which was loosely a portrait of Allan Bloom, commented on a connection to the idea that they are really saying that there are no significant people to write about. John Cheever said The diagnoses of the death of the novel one leaves to boors.
References
- Louis Rubin, The Curious Death of the Novel: Essays in American Literature
