What is the good of criticism
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 12:33, 11 October 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 12:34, 11 October 2012 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
| - | :"What is the [[good]] of [[critic]]ism? What is the good? -- A vast and terrible [[question mark]] which seizes the [[critic]] by the [[throat]] from the very first step in the first chapter he sets down to [[write]]. ...I sincerely believe that the best criticism is that which is both [[amusing]] and [[poetic]]: not a [[cold]], mathematical criticism which, on the [[pretext]] of explaining everything, has neither [[love]] nor [[hate]], and voluntarily strips itself of every shred of [[temperament]]... To be just, that is to say, to justify its existence, criticism should be [[partial]], [[passionate]] and [[political]], that is to say , written from an exclusive point of view, but a [[point of view]] that opens up the widest [[horizon]]s." --[[Charles Baudelaire]] writing on the occasion of the [[Salon of 1846]], first published as a booklet, Paris 1846) | + | :"What is the [[good]] of [[critic]]ism? What is the good? -- A vast and terrible [[question mark]] which seizes the [[critic]] by the [[throat]] from the very first step in the first chapter he sets down to [[write]]. ...I sincerely believe that the best criticism is that which is both [[amusing]] and [[poetic]]: not a [[cold]], mathematical criticism which, on the [[pretext]] of explaining everything, has neither [[love]] nor [[hate]], and voluntarily strips itself of every shred of [[temperament]]... To be just, that is to say, to justify its existence, criticism should be [[partial]], [[passionate]] and [[political]], that is to say , written from an exclusive point of view, but a [[point of view]] that opens up the widest [[horizon]]s." --[[Salon de 1846 (Baudelaire)|Charles Baudelaire writing on the occasion of the Salon of 1846]], first published as a booklet, Paris 1846) |
| :À quoi bon ? — Vaste et terrible point d’interrogation, qui saisit la critique au collet dès le premier pas qu’elle veut faire dans son premier chapitre. | :À quoi bon ? — Vaste et terrible point d’interrogation, qui saisit la critique au collet dès le premier pas qu’elle veut faire dans son premier chapitre. | ||
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 11 October 2012
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
- "What is the good of criticism? What is the good? -- A vast and terrible question mark which seizes the critic by the throat from the very first step in the first chapter he sets down to write. ...I sincerely believe that the best criticism is that which is both amusing and poetic: not a cold, mathematical criticism which, on the pretext of explaining everything, has neither love nor hate, and voluntarily strips itself of every shred of temperament... To be just, that is to say, to justify its existence, criticism should be partial, passionate and political, that is to say , written from an exclusive point of view, but a point of view that opens up the widest horizons." --Charles Baudelaire writing on the occasion of the Salon of 1846, first published as a booklet, Paris 1846)
- À quoi bon ? — Vaste et terrible point d’interrogation, qui saisit la critique au collet dès le premier pas qu’elle veut faire dans son premier chapitre.
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "What is the good of criticism?" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
