User:Jahsonic/The linguistic sign is not arbitrary  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 11:25, 6 October 2013
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 19:34, 22 October 2013
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[Image:Sign and signifier as imagined by de Saussure.jpg|thumb|right|200px|[[Signified]] (concept) and [[signifier]] (sound-image) as imagined by [[de Saussure]]]]
 +[[Image:The-bouba-kiki-effect.png|thumb|right|200px|The [[Bouba/kiki effect]] (1929)]]
 +[[Image:The linguistic sign is arbitrary (de Saussure).jpg|thumb|right|200px|The passage in ''[[Course_in_General_Linguistics#Arbitrariness|Course in General Linguistics]]'' (1916) in which de Saussure says that "the linguistic sign is arbitrary"]]
{{Template}} {{Template}}
 +:''status: draft''
-The linguistic sign is not [[arbitrary]]!+At the beginning of the 20th century the Swiss linguist [[Ferdinand de Saussure]] in his canonical ''[[Course_in_General_Linguistics#Arbitrariness|Course in General Linguistics]]'' (1916) stated that:
-Is the [[Bouba/kiki effect]] an instance of a [[universal language]]?+:The bond between the [[signifier]] and the [[signified]] is [[arbitrary]]. Since I mean by sign the whole that results from the associating of the signifier with the signified, I can simply say: ''the linguistic sign is arbitrary''. [[Course_in_General_Linguistics_%28full_text%29#2._Principle_I:_The_Arbitrary_Nature_of_the_Sign|<sup>tr. Wade Baskin, source]]<sup>[http://archive.org/stream/courseingenerall00saus#page/67/mode/1up]</sup>
-I would say yes.+This statement implies that in the [[evolution of language]], the [[naming of objects]] has been arbitrary and not dependent on [[sound symbolism]]. De Saussure even denied the significance of sound symbolism in [[onomatopoeia]] and [[interjection]]s.
-Not only does 95% of the [[informant]]s assign "kiki" to the [[angular]] shape and "bouba" to the [[curvilinear]] shape, my own research indicates that when informants are asked which of the two shapes is the '[[smart]]' one and which is the '[[dumb]]' one, "kiki" is usually designated as the smart one (remember, [[sharp]] in English also means [[intelligent]]) and "bouba" the dumb one (likewise, [[dull]] means not intelligent).+But the [[linguistic sign]] is not [[arbitrary]]!
-This means that [[shape]]s can be connected both to [[sound]]s and to [[affect]]s.+The proof: the [[Bouba/kiki effect]], an instance a [[universal language]] ruled by [[sound symbolism]].
-These findings have implications for the [[evolution of language]], because it suggests that the [[naming of objects]] is not completely arbitrary, as French linguist [[Ferdinand de Saussure|de Saussure]] in his canonical ''[[Course_in_General_Linguistics#Arbitrariness|Course in General Linguistics]]'' (1916) stated. +In the "Bouba/kiki" experiment, 95% of the [[informant]]s assigns "kiki" to the [[angular]] shape and "bouba" to the [[curvilinear]] shape.
-:The bond between the [[signifier]] and the [[signified]] is [[arbitrary]]. Since I mean by sign the whole that results from the associating of the signifier with the signified, I can simply say: ''the linguistic sign is arbitrary''. [[Course_in_General_Linguistics_%28full_text%29#2._Principle_I:_The_Arbitrary_Nature_of_the_Sign|<sup>source</sup>]]+Informal research conducted by [[Jan Willem Geerinck|myself]] indicates that when informants are asked which of the two shapes is the '[[smart]]' one and which is the '[[dumb]]' one, "kiki" is usually designated as the smart one (remember, [[sharp]] in English also means [[intelligent]]) and "bouba" the dumb one (likewise, [[dull]] means not intelligent).
 + 
 +This means that [[shape]]s can be connected both to [[sound]]s and to [[affect]]s.
I was surprised not to see the Bouba/kiki effect in ''[[The Search for the Perfect Language (The Making of Europe)]]'' by Umberto Eco. I was surprised not to see the Bouba/kiki effect in ''[[The Search for the Perfect Language (The Making of Europe)]]'' by Umberto Eco.
 +==See also==
 +*[[Sign_%28linguistics%29#The_Concept_of_Arbitrariness]]
 +*[[Course_in_General_Linguistics#Arbitrariness]]
 +*[[Course_in_General_Linguistics_%28full_text%29#2._Principle_I:_The_Arbitrary_Nature_of_the_Sign]]
 +*[[Sound symbolism]]
 +*''[[The Sign is Not Arbitrary]]'' (1949) by [[Dwight Bolinger]] of [[Harvard University]].
 +*[[Superseded scientific theories]]
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 19:34, 22 October 2013

Signified (concept) and signifier (sound-image) as imagined by de Saussure
Enlarge
Signified (concept) and signifier (sound-image) as imagined by de Saussure
The Bouba/kiki effect (1929)
The passage in Course in General Linguistics (1916) in which de Saussure says that "the linguistic sign is arbitrary"
Enlarge
The passage in Course in General Linguistics (1916) in which de Saussure says that "the linguistic sign is arbitrary"

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

status: draft

At the beginning of the 20th century the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in his canonical Course in General Linguistics (1916) stated that:

The bond between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary. Since I mean by sign the whole that results from the associating of the signifier with the signified, I can simply say: the linguistic sign is arbitrary. tr. Wade Baskin, source[1]

This statement implies that in the evolution of language, the naming of objects has been arbitrary and not dependent on sound symbolism. De Saussure even denied the significance of sound symbolism in onomatopoeia and interjections.

But the linguistic sign is not arbitrary!

The proof: the Bouba/kiki effect, an instance a universal language ruled by sound symbolism.

In the "Bouba/kiki" experiment, 95% of the informants assigns "kiki" to the angular shape and "bouba" to the curvilinear shape.

Informal research conducted by myself indicates that when informants are asked which of the two shapes is the 'smart' one and which is the 'dumb' one, "kiki" is usually designated as the smart one (remember, sharp in English also means intelligent) and "bouba" the dumb one (likewise, dull means not intelligent).

This means that shapes can be connected both to sounds and to affects.

I was surprised not to see the Bouba/kiki effect in The Search for the Perfect Language (The Making of Europe) by Umberto Eco.

See also




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Jahsonic/The linguistic sign is not arbitrary" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools