Pornographic Art and the Aesthetics of Pornography
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 18:34, 22 February 2018 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 22:40, 22 February 2018 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) (→Introduction | Maes, Hans | Pages 1-24) Next diff → |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==Toc== | ==Toc== | ||
| ===Introduction | Maes, Hans | Pages 1-24=== | ===Introduction | Maes, Hans | Pages 1-24=== | ||
| + | Parts of this introduction (the bit on the [[unsensualness]] of modern aesthetics), were reproduced in [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on 'erotic art' by Hans Maes (2014) ]]. | ||
| The introduction cites -- contra [[Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury|Shaftesbury]] and Kant's [[Disinterestedness|''désinteressement'']] -- Nietzsche's ''[[On the Genealogy of Morality]]'': | The introduction cites -- contra [[Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury|Shaftesbury]] and Kant's [[Disinterestedness|''désinteressement'']] -- Nietzsche's ''[[On the Genealogy of Morality]]'': | ||
Revision as of 22:40, 22 February 2018
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
Pornographic Art and the Aesthetics of Pornography (2013) is a book on the porn/art debate edited by Hans Maes.
On the cover is the 'fresh' image of Purple Hyacinth, fresh state/desiccated state by Michael Petry.
Toc
Introduction | Maes, Hans | Pages 1-24
Parts of this introduction (the bit on the unsensualness of modern aesthetics), were reproduced in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article on 'erotic art' by Hans Maes (2014) .
The introduction cites -- contra Shaftesbury and Kant's désinteressement -- Nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morality:
- "When, forsooth, our aesthetes never get tired of throwing into the scales in Kant's favour the fact that under the magic of beauty men can look at even naked female statues "without interest," we can certainly laugh a little at their expense:—in regard to this ticklish point the experiences of artists are more "interesting," and at any rate Pygmalion was not necessarily an "unaesthetic man."
Pornography, Art and Porno-Art | Mikkola, Mari | Pages 27-42
Exclusivism and Evaluation: Art, Erotica and Pornography | Patridge, Stephanie | Pages 43-57
A Pornographic Way of Seeing | Mumford, Stephen | Pages 58-72
Pornography and Acting | Zamir, Tzachi | Pages 75-99
The Fictional Character of Pornography | Liao, Shen-yi (et al.) | Pages 100-118
Image Economies and the Erotic Life of the Unlovely | Winters, Edward | Pages 119-138
Before Pornography: Sexual Representation in Ancient Roman Visual Culture | Clarke, John R. | Pages 141-161
Sheela-na-gig Again: The Birth of a New Style from the Spirit of Pornography | Trinks, Stefan | Pages 162-182
Aestheticizing Pornography for the 21st-century Academy: Pedagogy as Ars Erotica or Scientia Sexualis? | Bennett, David | Pages 183-202
Clean Feet and Dirty Dancing: The Erotic Pas de Deux and Boys in the Sand Miller, Edward D.Pages 205-220
The Pornography of Death Tercier, JohnPages 221-235
Porno-Graphic: Why Words Matter in Fiona Banner’s Arsewoman in Wonderland | Dhillon, Kim | Pages 236-251
A Queer Balance: Power Relations in Homosexual Representations and in Choosing FlowersPetry, Michael Pages 255-273
The Fluidity of Acceptability: Seduced by Art and Pornography and the Kinsey Institute Collection | Wallace, Marina | Pages 274-286
My Pornographic Development | Arrowsmith, Anna | Pages 287-297
See also
Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Pornographic Art and the Aesthetics of Pornography" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.
