Pierre-Simon Laplace
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
Revision as of 05:33, 17 August 2011 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 12:39, 7 November 2011 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template}} | {{Template}} | ||
'''Pierre-Simon, marquis de Laplace''' (23 March 1749 – 5 March 1827) was a French [[mathematician]] and [[astronomer]] whose work was pivotal to the development of [[astronomy|mathematical astronomy]] and [[statistics]]. He summarized and extended the work of his predecessors in his five volume ''Mécanique Céleste'' ([[Celestial Mechanics]]) (1799–1825). This work translated the geometric study of [[classical mechanics]] to one based on [[calculus]], opening up a broader range of problems. In statistics, the so-called [[Bayesian probability|Bayesian interpretation]] of probability was mainly developed by Laplace. | '''Pierre-Simon, marquis de Laplace''' (23 March 1749 – 5 March 1827) was a French [[mathematician]] and [[astronomer]] whose work was pivotal to the development of [[astronomy|mathematical astronomy]] and [[statistics]]. He summarized and extended the work of his predecessors in his five volume ''Mécanique Céleste'' ([[Celestial Mechanics]]) (1799–1825). This work translated the geometric study of [[classical mechanics]] to one based on [[calculus]], opening up a broader range of problems. In statistics, the so-called [[Bayesian probability|Bayesian interpretation]] of probability was mainly developed by Laplace. | ||
+ | ==Laplace's demon== | ||
+ | Laplace published the first articulation of [[causal determinism|causal or scientific determinism]]: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in a single formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the tiniest atom; for such an intellect nothing would be uncertain and the future just like the past would be present before its eyes.|Pierre Simon Laplace, ''A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | This intellect is often referred to as ''Laplace's demon'' (in the same vein as ''[[Maxwell's demon]]'') and sometimes ''Laplace's Superman'' (after [[Hans Reichenbach]]). Laplace, himself, did not use the word "demon", which was a later embellishment. As translated into English above, he simply referred to: ''"Une intelligence... Rien ne serait incertain pour elle, et l'avenir comme le passé, serait présent à ses yeux."'' | ||
+ | |||
==Napoleon== | ==Napoleon== | ||
An account of a famous interaction between Laplace and Napoleon is provided by Rouse Ball: | An account of a famous interaction between Laplace and Napoleon is provided by Rouse Ball: |
Revision as of 12:39, 7 November 2011
Related e |
Google
Featured: |
Pierre-Simon, marquis de Laplace (23 March 1749 – 5 March 1827) was a French mathematician and astronomer whose work was pivotal to the development of mathematical astronomy and statistics. He summarized and extended the work of his predecessors in his five volume Mécanique Céleste (Celestial Mechanics) (1799–1825). This work translated the geometric study of classical mechanics to one based on calculus, opening up a broader range of problems. In statistics, the so-called Bayesian interpretation of probability was mainly developed by Laplace.
Laplace's demon
Laplace published the first articulation of causal or scientific determinism:
- We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in a single formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the tiniest atom; for such an intellect nothing would be uncertain and the future just like the past would be present before its eyes.|Pierre Simon Laplace, A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities
This intellect is often referred to as Laplace's demon (in the same vein as Maxwell's demon) and sometimes Laplace's Superman (after Hans Reichenbach). Laplace, himself, did not use the word "demon", which was a later embellishment. As translated into English above, he simply referred to: "Une intelligence... Rien ne serait incertain pour elle, et l'avenir comme le passé, serait présent à ses yeux."
Napoleon
An account of a famous interaction between Laplace and Napoleon is provided by Rouse Ball:
- Laplace went in state to Napoleon to accept a copy of his work, and the following account of the interview is well authenticated, and so characteristic of all the parties concerned that I quote it in full. Someone had told Napoleon that the book contained no mention of the name of God; Napoleon, who was fond of putting embarrassing questions, received it with the remark, 'M. Laplace, they tell me you have written this large book on the system of the universe, and have never even mentioned its Creator.' Laplace, who, though the most supple of politicians, was as stiff as a martyr on every point of his philosophy, drew himself up and answered bluntly, Je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là. ("I had no need of that hypothesis.") Napoleon, greatly amused, told this reply to Lagrange, who exclaimed, Ah! c'est une belle hypothèse; ça explique beaucoup de choses. ("Ah, it is a fine hypothesis; it explains many things.")