Philosophy  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 13:11, 16 December 2012
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)
(See also)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:07, 21 November 2018
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[Image:Nietzsche_in_Basel.jpg|thumb|left|200px|[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] (c. 1875)]]
 +{| class="toccolours" style="float: left; margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 2em; font-size: 85%; background:#c6dbf7; color:black; width:30em; max-width: 40%;" cellspacing="5"
 +| style="text-align: left;" |
 +"([[Philosophy]] is) the yelping hound howling at her lord ([[poetry]]) [[(Philosophy is) the yelping hound howling at her lord (poetry) |[...]]] " --[[Plato]], ''The Republic''
 +<hr>
 +"[[Nothing]] is more usual than for [[philosophy|philosopher]]s to encroach on the province of [[grammar]]ians, and to engage in disputes of [[word]]s, while they imagine they are handling [[controversies]] of the deepest importance and concern." - [[David Hume]]
 +|}
 +[[Image:Glass half full or half empty.JPG|thumb|right|200px|[[Is the glass half empty or half full?]],<small> photo © [[JWG]]</small>]]
[[Image:Plato and Aristotle in The School of Athens painting by Raphael.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Plato (left) and Aristotle (right), a detail of ''[[The School of Athens]]''<!-- this should link to an article about the famous artwork -->, a fresco by [[Raphael]]. Aristotle gestures to the [[earth]], representing his belief in knowledge through empirical observation and experience, while holding a copy of his ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]'' in his hand. Plato holds his ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' and gestures to the [[heaven]]s, representing his belief in [[The Forms]]]] [[Image:Plato and Aristotle in The School of Athens painting by Raphael.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Plato (left) and Aristotle (right), a detail of ''[[The School of Athens]]''<!-- this should link to an article about the famous artwork -->, a fresco by [[Raphael]]. Aristotle gestures to the [[earth]], representing his belief in knowledge through empirical observation and experience, while holding a copy of his ''[[Nicomachean Ethics]]'' in his hand. Plato holds his ''[[Timaeus (dialogue)|Timaeus]]'' and gestures to the [[heaven]]s, representing his belief in [[The Forms]]]]
[[Image:Vico La scienza nuova.gif|thumb|right|200px|''[[New Science]] ([[1775]]) by [[Giambattista Vico]]]] [[Image:Vico La scienza nuova.gif|thumb|right|200px|''[[New Science]] ([[1775]]) by [[Giambattista Vico]]]]
[[Image:Ethics by Spinoza.jpg|Spinoza's|thumb|right|200px|By virtue of his [[magnum opus]], the posthumous ''[[Ethics (book)|Ethics]]'', [[Spinoza]] is considered one of [[Western philosophy|Western philosophy's]] definitive ethicists.]] [[Image:Ethics by Spinoza.jpg|Spinoza's|thumb|right|200px|By virtue of his [[magnum opus]], the posthumous ''[[Ethics (book)|Ethics]]'', [[Spinoza]] is considered one of [[Western philosophy|Western philosophy's]] definitive ethicists.]]
[[Image:Therese Philosophe Original edition.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[Thérèse Philosophe]]'' ([[1748]]) was ''the'' bestseller of the [[French Enlightenment]]]] [[Image:Therese Philosophe Original edition.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[Thérèse Philosophe]]'' ([[1748]]) was ''the'' bestseller of the [[French Enlightenment]]]]
-[[Image:Inversions.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[Inversions]]'', the first French [[gay]] journal is published. Produced between [[1924]] and [[1926]], it stopped publication after the French government charged the publishers with "[[Outrage aux bonnes mœurs]]". Its full title was ''Inversions ... in [[art]], [[literature]], [[philosophy]] and [[science]]''.]] 
[[Image:The Heart Has Its Reasons by Odilon Redon.jpg |thumb|right|200px|''[[The heart has its reasons, of which reason knows nothing]]'' (c.[[1887]]) by [[Odilon Redon]], a phrase from the ''[[Pensées]]'' ([[1669]]) by [[Blaise Pascal]]]] [[Image:The Heart Has Its Reasons by Odilon Redon.jpg |thumb|right|200px|''[[The heart has its reasons, of which reason knows nothing]]'' (c.[[1887]]) by [[Odilon Redon]], a phrase from the ''[[Pensées]]'' ([[1669]]) by [[Blaise Pascal]]]]
 +[[Image:The Sleep of Reason.jpg|thumb|right|200px|''[[The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters]]'' is a print by [[Francisco Goya]] from the ''[[Caprichos]]'' series]]
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-:"[[Philosophers encroaching on the province of grammarians|Nothing is more usual than for philosophers to encroach on the province of grammarians]]." - [[David Hume]]+'''Philosophy''' is the [[Research|study]] of general and fundamental [[problem]]s, such as those connected with [[reality]], [[Ontology|existence]], [[Epistemology|knowledge]], [[Axiology|values]], [[logic|reason]], [[Philosophy of mind|mind]], and [[philosophy of language|language]]. Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on [[dialectic|rational argument]]. In more casual speech, by extension, "philosophy" can refer to the most basic [[belief system]] of an individual or group.
 + 
 +The word "philosophy" comes from the [[Ancient Greek]] ''[[φιλοσοφία]]'' (''philosophia''), which literally means "love of wisdom". The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker [[Pythagoras]].
-'''Philosophy''' is the discipline concerned with questions of how one should live ([[ethics]]); what sorts of things exist and what are their essential natures ([[metaphysics]]); what counts as genuine knowledge ([[epistemology]]); and what are the correct principles of reasoning ([[logic]]). 
==History== ==History==
-:''[[History of philosophy]]''+:''[[history of philosophy]]''
Many societies have considered philosophical questions and built philosophical traditions based upon each other's works. Many societies have considered philosophical questions and built philosophical traditions based upon each other's works.
Line 17: Line 26:
[[Eastern philosophy]] is organized by the chronological periods of each region. Historians of western philosophy usually divide the subject into three or more periods, the most important being [[ancient philosophy]], [[medieval philosophy]], and [[modern philosophy]]. [[Eastern philosophy]] is organized by the chronological periods of each region. Historians of western philosophy usually divide the subject into three or more periods, the most important being [[ancient philosophy]], [[medieval philosophy]], and [[modern philosophy]].
-===Ancient philosophy===+==Areas of inquiry==
-:''[[Ancient philosophy]]''+Philosophy is divided into many sub-fields. These include epistemology, logic, metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics. Some of the major areas of study are considered individually below.
-====Egypt and Babylon====+===Epistemology===
-There are authors who date the philosophical maxims of Ptahhotep before the 25th century. For instance, Pulitzer Prize winning historian Will Durant dates these writings as early as 2880 BCE within ''[[The Story of Civilization|The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental History]]''. Durant claims that Ptahhotep could be considered the very first philosopher in virtue of having the earliest and surviving fragments of moral philosophy (i.e., "The Maxims of Ptah-Hotep"). Ptahhotep's grandson, Ptahhotep Tshefi, is traditionally credited with being the author of the collection of wise sayings known as ''[[The Maxims of Ptahhotep]]'', whose opening lines attribute authorship to the vizier Ptahhotep: ''Instruction of the Mayor of the city, the Vizier Ptahhotep, under the Majesty of King Isesi''.+:''[[Epistemology]]''
 +Epistemology is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge, such as the relationships between [[truth]], [[belief]], and [[theory of justification|theories of justification]].
-The origins of [[Babylonia]]n philosophy can be traced back to the wisdom of early [[Mesopotamia]], which embodied certain philosophies of life, particularly [[ethics]], in the forms of [[dialectic]], [[dialogue]]s, [[epic poetry]], [[folklore]], [[hymn]]s, [[lyrics]], [[prose]], and [[proverb]]s. The [[reasoning]] and [[rationality]] of the Babylonians developed beyond [[empiricism|empirical]] observation. The Babylonian text ''Dialog of Pessimism'' contains similarities to the [[agnostic]] thought of the [[sophists]], the [[Heraclitus|Heraclitean]] doctrine of contrasts, and the dialogues of [[Plato]], as well as a precursor to the [[Maieutics|maieutic]] [[Socratic method]] of [[Socrates]] and Plato. The [[Milesians (Greek)|Milesian]] philosopher [[Thales]] is also traditionally said to have studied philosophy in Mesopotamia.+[[Philosophical skepticism|Skepticism]] is the position which questions the possibility of completely justifying any truth. The [[regress argument]], a fundamental problem in epistemology, occurs when, in order to completely prove any statement P, its justification itself needs to be supported by another justification. This chain can do three possible options, all of which are unsatisfactory according to the [[Münchhausen trilemma]]. One option is [[infinitism]], where this chain of justification can go on forever. Another option is [[foundationalism]], where the chain of justifications eventually relies on [[basic beliefs]] or [[axiom]]s that are left unproven. The last option, such as in [[coherentism]], is making the chain [[circular argument|circular]] so that a statement is included in its own chain of justification.
-====Ancient Chinese====+[[Rationalism]] is the emphasis on reasoning as a source of knowledge. [[Empiricism]] is the emphasis on observational evidence via sensory experience over other evidence as the source of knowledge. Rationalism claims that every possible object of knowledge can be deduced from coherent premises without observation. Empiricism claims that at least some knowledge is only a matter of observation. For this, Empiricism often cites the concept of [[tabula rasa]], where individuals are not born with [[mental content]] and that knowledge builds from experience or perception. [[Epistemological solipsism]] is the idea that the existence of the world outside the mind is an [[unresolvable]] question.
-:''[[Chinese philosophy]]''+
-Philosophy has had a tremendous effect on [[China|Chinese civilization]], and throughout [[East Asia]]. The majority of Chinese philosophy originates in the [[Spring and Autumn]] and [[Warring States Period|Warring States]] era, during a period known as the "[[Hundred Schools of Thought]]", which was characterized by significant intellectual and cultural developments. It was during this era that the major philosophies of China, [[Confucianism]], [[Mohism]], [[Legalism (Chinese philosophy)|Legalism]], and [[Taoism]], arose, along with philosophies that later fell into obscurity, like [[Agriculturalism]], [[School of Naturalists|Chinese Naturalism]], and the [[School of Names|Logicians]]. Of the many philosophical schools of China, only Confucianism and Taoism existed after the [[Qin Dynasty]] [[Burning of books and burying of scholars|suppressed any Chinese philosophy]] that was opposed to Legalism.+
-Confucianism is [[humanism|humanistic]], philosophy that believes that human beings are teachable, improvable and perfectible through personal and communal endeavour especially including self-cultivation and self-creation. Confucianism focuses on the cultivation of virtue and maintenance of ethics, the most basic of which are ''ren'', ''yi'', and ''li''. ''Ren'' is an obligation of [[altruism]] and humaneness for other individuals within a community, ''yi'' is the upholding of righteousness and the moral disposition to do good, and ''li'' is a system of norms and propriety that determines how a person should properly act within a community.+[[Parmenides]] (fl. 500 BC) argued that it is impossible to doubt that thinking actually occurs. But thinking must have an object, therefore something ''beyond'' thinking really exists. Parmenides deduced that what really exists must have certain properties—for example, that it cannot come into existence or cease to exist, that it is a coherent whole, that it remains the same eternally (in fact, exists altogether outside time). This is known as the [[third man argument]]. [[Plato]] (427–347 BC) combined rationalism with a form of [[philosophical realism|realism]]. The philosopher's work is to consider being, and the essence ([[ousia]]) of things. But the characteristic of essences is that they are universal. The nature of a man, a triangle, a tree, applies to all men, all triangles, all trees. Plato argued that these essences are mind-independent "[[theory of forms|forms]]", that humans (but particularly philosophers) can come to know by reason, and by ignoring the distractions of sense-perception.
-[[Taoism]] focuses on establishing harmony with the [[Tao]], which is origin of and the totality of everything that exists. The word "Tao" (or "Dao", depending on the [[romanization]] scheme) is usually translated as "way", "path" or "principle". Taoist propriety and ethics emphasize the [[Three Treasures (Taoism)|Three Jewels of the Tao]]: [[compassion]], [[moderation]], and [[humility]], while Taoist thought generally focuses on [[nature]], the relationship between humanity and the cosmos ({{lang|zh|天人相应}}); [[health]] and [[longevity]]; and [[wu wei]], action through inaction. Harmony with the [[Universe]], or the origin of it through the Tao, is the intended result of many Taoist rules and practices.+Modern rationalism begins with [[Descartes]]. Reflection on the nature of perceptual experience, as well as scientific discoveries in physiology and optics, led Descartes (and also [[John Locke|Locke]]) to the view that we are directly aware of ideas, rather than objects. This view gave rise to three questions:
-====Ancient Graeco-Roman====+# Is an idea a true copy of the real thing that it represents? Sensation is not a direct interaction between bodily objects and our sense, but is a physiological process involving representation (for example, an image on the retina). Locke thought that a "secondary quality" such as a sensation of green could in no way resemble the arrangement of particles in matter that go to produce this sensation, although he thought that "primary qualities" such as shape, size, number, were really in objects.
 +# How can physical objects such as chairs and tables, or even physiological processes in the brain, give rise to mental items such as ideas? This is part of what became known as the [[mind-body problem]].
 +# If all the contents of awareness are ideas, how can we know that anything exists apart from ideas?
-Ancient Graeco-Roman philosophy is a period of Western philosophy, starting in the 6th century [c. 585] BC to the 6th century AD. It is usually divided into three periods: the [[pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic period]], the period of [[Plato]] and [[Aristotle]], and the post-Aristotelian (or [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic]]) period. A fourth period that is sometimes added includes the [[Neoplatonic]] and [[Christian]] philosophers of [[Late Antiquity]]. The most important of the ancient philosophers (in terms of subsequent influence) are Plato and Aristotle. Plato specifically, is credited as the founder of Western philosophy. The philosopher [[Alfred North Whitehead]] said of Plato: "The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato. I do not mean the systematic scheme of thought which scholars have doubtfully extracted from his writings. I allude to the wealth of general ideas scattered through them."+Descartes tried to address the last problem by reason. He began, echoing Parmenides, with a principle that he thought could not coherently be denied: I ''think'', therefore I ''am'' (often given in his original Latin: ''[[Cogito ergo sum]]''). From this principle, Descartes went on to construct a complete system of knowledge (which involves proving the [[existence of God]], using, among other means, a version of the [[ontological argument]]). His view that reason alone could yield substantial truths about reality strongly influenced those philosophers usually considered modern rationalists (such as [[Baruch Spinoza]], [[Gottfried Leibniz]], and [[Christian Wolff (philosopher)|Christian Wolff]]), while provoking criticism from other philosophers who have retrospectively come to be grouped together as empiricists.
-The main subjects of ancient philosophy are: understanding the fundamental causes and principles of the [[universe]]; explaining it in an economical way; the epistemological problem of reconciling the diversity and change of the natural universe, with the possibility of obtaining fixed and certain knowledge about it; questions about things that cannot be perceived by the senses, such as [[number]]s, [[classical element|elements]], [[universals]], and [[gods]]. Socrates is said to have been the initiator of more focused study upon the human things including the analysis of patterns of [[reasoning]] and argument and the nature of [[the good life]] and the importance of understanding and knowledge in order to pursue it; the explication of the concept of [[justice]], and its relation to various [[political systems]].+===Logic===
-In this period the crucial features of the Western [[philosophical method]] were established: a critical approach to received or established views, and the appeal to reason and argumentation. This includes Socrate's [[dialectic]] method of inquiry, known as the [[Socratic method]] or method of "elenchus", which he largely applied to the examination of key moral concepts such as the Good and [[Justice]]. To solve a problem, it would be broken down into a series of questions, the answers to which gradually distill the answer a person would seek. The influence of this approach is most strongly felt today in the use of the [[scientific method]], in which [[hypothesis]] is the first stage.+:''[[logic]]''
 +Logic is the study of the principles of correct [[reasoning]]. [[Argument]]s use either deductive reasoning or inductive reasoning. [[Deductive reasoning]] is when, given certain statements (called [[premise]]s), other statements (called conclusions) are [[logical consequence|unavoidably implied]]. [[Rules of inference]]s from premises include the most popular method, [[modus ponens]], where given “A” and “If A then B”, then “B” must be concluded. A common convention for a deductive argument is the [[syllogism]]. An argument is termed [[validity|valid]] if its conclusion does indeed follow from its premises, whether the premises are true or not, while an argument is [[soundness|sound]] if its conclusion follows from premises that are true. [[Propositional logic]] uses premises that are [[proposition]]s, which are [[Statement (logic)|declarations]] that are either true or false, while [[predicate logic]] uses more complex premises called [[formula (mathematical logic)|formulae]] that contain [[Variable (math)|variables]]. These can be assigned values or can be [[quantification|quantified]] as to when they apply with the [[universal quantifier]] (always apply) or the [[existential quantifier]] (applies at least once). [[Inductive reasoning]] makes conclusions or generalizations based on [[probabilistic reasoning]]. For example, if “90% of humans are right-handed” and “Joe is human” then “Joe is probably right-handed”. Fields in logic include [[mathematical logic]] (formal symbolic logic) and [[philosophical logic]].
-====Ancient Indian====+===Metaphysics===
 +:''[[metaphysics]]''
 +Metaphysics is the study of the most general features of [[reality]], such as [[existence]], [[time]], the relationship between [[mind]] and [[body]], [[object (philosophy)|objects]] and their [[property (philosophy)|properties]], wholes and their parts, events, processes, and [[causality|causation]]. Traditional branches of metaphysics include [[cosmology]], the study of the [[world]] in its entirety, and [[ontology]], the study of [[being]].
-The term Indian philosophy (Sanskrit: ''Darshanas''), refers to any of several schools of [[Eastern philosophy|philosophical thought]] that originated in the [[Indian subcontinent]], including [[Hindu philosophy]], [[Buddhist philosophy]], and [[Jain philosophy]]. Having the same or rather intertwined origins, all of these philosophies have a common underlying themes of [[Dharma]] and [[Karma]], and similarly attempt to explain the attainment of emancipation. They have been formalized and promulgated chiefly between 1000 BC to a few centuries AD.+Within metaphysics itself there are a wide range of differing philosophical [[theory|theories]]. [[Idealism]], for example, is the belief that reality is mentally constructed or otherwise immaterial while [[Philosophical realism|realism]] holds that reality, or at least some part of it, exists independently of the mind. [[Subjective idealism]] describes objects as no more than collections or "bundles" of sense data in the perceiver. The 18th century philosopher [[George Berkeley]] contended that existence is fundamentally tied to perception with the phrase ''Esse est aut percipi aut percipere'' or "To be is to be perceived or to perceive".
-[[India]]'s philosophical tradition dates back to the composition of the [[Upanisads]] in the [[Vedic period#The later Vedic period|later Vedic period]] (c. 1000-500 BCE). Subsequent schools ([[Sanskrit|Skt]]: ''Darshanas'') of Indian philosophy were identified as orthodox ([[Sanskrit|Skt]]: ''[[astika]]'') or non-orthodox (Skt: ''nastika'') depending on whether they regarded the [[Vedas]] as an infallible source of knowledge. By some classifications, there are six schools of orthodox [[Hindu philosophy]] and three heterodox schools. The orthodox are [[Nyaya]], [[Vaisesika]], [[Samkhya]], [[Yoga]], [[Purva mimamsa]] and [[Vedanta]]. The Heterodox are [[Jainism|Jain]], [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and materialist ([[Cārvāka]]). Other classifications also include [[Pashupata Shaivism|Pashupata]], [[Shaiva Siddhanta|Saiva]], [[Raseśvara]] and [[Pāṇini]] Darśana with the other orthodox schools.+In addition to the aforementioned views, however, there is also an ontological [[dichotomy]] within metaphysics between the concepts of particulars and universals as well. [[Particular]]s are those objects that are said to exist in space and time, as opposed to [[abstract objects]], such as numbers. [[Universals]] are properties held by multiple particulars, such as redness or a gender. The type of [[existence]], if any, of universals and abstract objects is an issue of serious [[debate]] within metaphysical philosophy. [[philosophical realism|Realism]] is the philosophical position that universals do in fact exist, while [[nominalism]] is the negation, or denial of universals, abstract objects, or both. [[Conceptualism]] holds that universals exist, but only within the mind's perception.
-Competition and integration between the various schools was intense during their formative years, especially between 500 BC to 200 AD. Some like the [[Jain]], [[Buddhist]], [[Shaiva]] and [[Vedanta]] schools survived, while others like [[Samkhya]] and [[Ajivika]] did not, either being assimilated or going extinct. The [[Sanskrit]] term for "philosopher" is ''{{IAST|dārśanika}}'', one who is familiar with the systems of philosophy, or ''{{IAST|darśanas}}''.+The question of whether or not [[existence]] is a [[wikt:predicate|predicate]] has been discussed since the Early Modern period. [[Essence]] is the set of attributes that make an object what it fundamentally is and without which it loses its [[Personal identity|identity]]. Essence is contrasted with [[accident (philosophy)|accident]]: a property that the substance has [[metaphysical contingency|contingently]], without which the substance can still retain its identity.
-In the history of the [[Indian subcontinent]], following the establishment of a [[Vedic period|Vedic]] culture, the development of philosophical and religious thought over a period of two millennia gave rise to what came to be called the six schools of ''[[Nastika|astika]]'', or orthodox, Indian or Hindu philosophy. These schools have come to be synonymous with the greater religion of [[Hinduism]], which was a development of the early [[Historical Vedic religion|Vedic religion]].+===Moral and political philosophy===
-====Ancient Persian====+:''[[moral philosophy]], [[political philosophy]]''
-Persian philosophy can be traced back as far as Old Iranian philosophical traditions and thoughts, with their ancient [[Indo-Iranians|Indo-Iranian]] roots. These were considerably influenced by [[Zarathustra]]'s teachings. Throughout Iranian history and due to remarkable political and social influences such as the [[Alexander the Great|Macedonian]], the [[Islamic conquest of Persia|Arab]], and the [[Mongol invasion of Central Asia|Mongol invasions]] of Persia, a wide spectrum of schools of thought arose. These espoused a variety of views on philosophical questions, extending from Old Iranian and mainly [[Zoroastrianism]]-influenced traditions to schools appearing in the late pre-Islamic era, such as [[Manicheism]] and [[Mazdakism]], as well as various post-Islamic schools. Iranian philosophy after Arab invasion of [[Persia]] is characterized by different interactions with the [[Ancient philosophy|old Iranian philosophy]], the [[Greek philosophy]] and with the development of [[Islamic philosophy]]. [[Illuminationism]] and the [[transcendent theosophy]] are regarded as two of the main philosophical traditions of that era in Persia. Zoroastrianism has been identified as one of the key early events in the development of philosophy.+Ethics, or "moral philosophy," is concerned primarily with the question of the best way to live, and secondarily, concerning the question of whether this question can be answered. The main branches of ethics are [[meta-ethics]], [[normative ethics]], and [[applied ethics]]. Meta-ethics concerns the nature of ethical thought, such as the origins of the words good and bad, and origins of other comparative words of various ethical systems, whether there are absolute ethical truths, and how such truths could be known. Normative ethics are more concerned with the questions of how one ought to act, and what the right course of action is. This is where most ethical theories are generated. Lastly, applied ethics go beyond theory and step into real world ethical practice, such as questions of whether or not abortion is correct. Ethics is also associated with the idea of [[morality]], and the two are often interchangeable.
-===5th–16th centuries===+One debate that has commanded the attention of ethicists in the modern era has been between [[consequentialism]] (actions are to be morally evaluated solely by their ''consequences'') and [[deontology]] (actions are to be morally evaluated solely by consideration of agents' ''duties'', the ''rights'' of those whom the action concerns, or both). [[Jeremy Bentham]] and [[John Stuart Mill]] are famous for propagating [[utilitarianism]], which is the idea that the fundamental moral rule is to strive toward the "greatest happiness for the greatest number". However, in promoting this idea they also necessarily promoted the broader doctrine of consequentialism. Adopting a position opposed to consequentialism, [[Immanuel Kant]] argued that moral principles were simply products of reason. Kant believed that the incorporation of consequences into moral deliberation was a deep mistake, since it denies the necessity of practical maxims in governing the working of the will. According to Kant, reason requires that we conform our actions to the [[categorical imperative]], which is an absolute duty. An important 20th-century deontologist, [[W.D. Ross]], argued for weaker forms of duties called [[prima facie duty|''prima facie'' duties]].
-====Europe====+
-=====Medieval=====+
-Medieval philosophy is the philosophy of [[Western Europe]] and the [[Middle East]] during the [[Middle Ages]], roughly extending from the Christianization of the [[Roman Empire]] until the Renaissance. Medieval philosophy is defined partly by the rediscovery and further development of classical [[Greek philosophy|Greek]] and [[Hellenistic philosophy]], and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate the then widespread sacred doctrines of [[Abrahamic religion]] ([[Islam]], [[Judaism]], and [[Christianity]]) with [[secularism|secular]] learning.+
-The history of western European medieval philosophy is traditionally divided into two main periods: the period in the [[Latin West]] following the [[Early Middle Ages]] until the 12th century, when the works of [[Aristotle]] and [[Plato]] were preserved and cultivated; and the "golden age" of the 12th, 13th and 14th centuries in the Latin West, which witnessed the culmination of the recovery of ancient philosophy, and significant developments in the field of [[philosophy of religion]], [[logic]] and [[metaphysics]].+More recent works have emphasized the role of character in ethics, a movement known as the ''[[aretaic turn]]'' (that is, the ''turn towards virtues''). One strain of this movement followed the work of [[Bernard Williams]]. Williams noted that rigid forms of consequentialism and deontology demanded that people behave impartially. This, Williams argued, requires that people abandon their personal projects, and hence their personal [[integrity]], in order to be considered moral. [[G.E.M. Anscombe]], in an influential paper, "[[Modern Moral Philosophy]]" (1958), revived [[virtue ethics]] as an alternative to what was seen as the entrenched positions of Kantianism and consequentialism. Aretaic perspectives have been inspired in part by research of ancient conceptions of virtue. For example, [[Aristotle's ethics]] demands that people follow the ''Aristotelian mean'', or balance between two vices; and [[Confucius|Confucian]] ethics argues that virtue consists largely in striving for harmony with other people. Virtue ethics in general has since gained many adherents, and has been defended by such philosophers as [[Philippa Foot]], [[Alasdair MacIntyre]], and [[Rosalind Hursthouse]].
-The medieval era was disparagingly treated by the Renaissance humanists, who saw it as a barbaric "middle" period between the classical age of Greek and Roman culture, and the "rebirth" or ''renaissance'' of classical culture. Yet this period of nearly a thousand years was the longest period of philosophical development in Europe, and possibly the richest. [[Jorge Gracia]] has argued that "in intensity, sophistication, and achievement, the philosophical flowering in the thirteenth century could be rightly said to rival the golden age of Greek philosophy in the fourth century B.C."+[[Political philosophy]] is the study of [[government]] and the relationship of individuals (or families and clans) to communities including the [[State (polity)|state]]. It includes questions about justice, law, property, and the rights and obligations of the citizen. Politics and ethics are traditionally inter-linked subjects, as both discuss the question of what is good and how people should live.
-Some problems discussed throughout this period are the relation of [[faith]] to [[reason]], the existence and unity of [[God]], the object of [[theology]] and [[metaphysics]], the problems of knowledge, of universals, and of individuation.+From ancient times, and well beyond them, the roots of justification for political authority were inescapably tied to outlooks on human nature. In ''The Republic'', [[Plato]] presented the argument that the ideal society would be run by a council of [[philosopher-king]]s, since those best at philosophy are best able to realize the good. Even Plato, however, required philosophers to make their way in the world for many years before beginning their rule at the age of fifty. For [[Aristotle]], humans are political animals (i.e. social animals), and governments are set up to pursue good for the community. Aristotle reasoned that, since the state (''[[polis]]'') was the highest form of community, it has the purpose of pursuing the highest good. Aristotle viewed political power as the result of natural inequalities in skill and virtue. Because of these differences, he favored an aristocracy of the able and virtuous. For Aristotle, the person cannot be complete unless he or she lives in a community. His ''The Nicomachean Ethics'' and ''The Politics'' are meant to be read in that order. The first book addresses virtues (or "excellences") in the person as a citizen; the second addresses the proper form of government to ensure that citizens will be virtuous, and therefore complete. Both books deal with the essential role of justice in civic life.
-Philosophers from the Middle Ages include the Christian philosophers [[Augustine of Hippo]], [[Boethius]], [[Anselm of Canterbury|Anselm]], [[Gilbert of Poitiers]], [[Peter Abelard]], [[Roger Bacon]], [[Bonaventure]], [[Thomas Aquinas]], [[Duns Scotus]], [[William of Ockham]] and [[Jean Buridan]]; the Jewish philosophers [[Maimonides]] and [[Gersonides]]; and the [[Muslim]] philosophers [[Al-Kindi|Alkindus]], [[Al-Farabi|Alfarabi]], [[Ibn al-Haytham|Alhazen]], [[Avicenna]], [[Al-Ghazali|Algazel]], [[Ibn Bajjah|Avempace]], [[Ibn Tufail|Abubacer]], [[Ibn Khaldūn]], and [[Averroes]]. The medieval tradition of [[Scholasticism]] continued to flourish as late as the 17th century, in figures such as [[Francisco Suarez]] and [[John of St. Thomas]].+[[Nicolas of Cusa]] rekindled Platonic thought in the early 15th century. He promoted democracy in Medieval Europe, both in his writings and in his organization of the Council of Florence. Unlike Aristotle and the Hobbesian tradition to follow, Cusa saw human beings as equal and divine (that is, made in God's image), so democracy would be the only just form of government. Cusa's views are credited by some as sparking the Italian Renaissance, which gave rise to the notion of "Nation-States".
-Aquinas, father of [[Thomism]], was immensely influential in Catholic Europe, placed a great emphasis on reason and argumentation, and was one of the first to use the new translation of Aristotle's metaphysical and epistemological writing. His work was a significant departure from the [[Neoplatonic]] and Augustinian thinking that had dominated much of early Scholasticism.+Later, [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] rejected the views of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas as unrealistic. The ideal sovereign is not the embodiment of the moral virtues; rather the sovereign does whatever is successful and necessary, rather than what is morally praiseworthy. [[Thomas Hobbes]] also contested many elements of Aristotle's views. For Hobbes, human nature is essentially anti-social: people are essentially egoistic, and this egoism makes life difficult in the natural state of things. Moreover, Hobbes argued, though people may have natural inequalities, these are trivial, since no particular talents or virtues that people may have will make them safe from harm inflicted by others. For these reasons, Hobbes concluded that the state arises from a common agreement to raise the community out of the [[state of nature]]. This can only be done by the establishment of a [[sovereignty|sovereign]], in which (or whom) is vested complete control over the community, and is able to inspire awe and terror in its subjects.
-=====Renaissance=====+Many in the Enlightenment were unsatisfied with existing doctrines in political philosophy, which seemed to marginalize or neglect the possibility of a [[democracy|democratic state]]. [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] was among those who attempted to overturn these doctrines: he responded to Hobbes by claiming that a human is by nature a kind of "[[noble savage]]", and that society and social contracts corrupt this nature. Another critic was [[John Locke]]. In ''[[Two Treatises of Government|Second Treatise on Government]]'' he agreed with Hobbes that the nation-state was an efficient tool for raising humanity out of a deplorable state, but he argued that the sovereign might become an abominable institution compared to the relatively benign unmodulated state of nature.
-The Renaissance ("rebirth") was a period of transition between the Middle Ages and modern thought, in which the recovery of classical texts helped shift philosophical interests away from technical studies in logic, metaphysics, and theology towards eclectic inquiries into morality, philology, and mysticism. The study of the classics and the humane arts generally, such as history and literature, enjoyed a scholarly interest hitherto unknown in Christendom, a tendency referred to as [[humanism]]. Displacing the medieval interest in metaphysics and logic, the humanists followed [[Petrarch]] in making man and his virtues the focus of philosophy.+Following the doctrine of the [[fact-value distinction]], due in part to the influence of [[David Hume]] and his student [[Adam Smith]], appeals to human nature for political justification were weakened. Nevertheless, many political philosophers, especially [[moral realism|moral realists]], still make use of some essential human nature as a basis for their arguments.
-The study of classical philosophy also developed in two new ways. On the one hand, the study of Aristotle was changed through the influence of [[Averroism]]. The disagreements between these Averroist Aristotelians, and more orthodox catholic Aristotelians such as [[Albertus Magnus]] and [[Thomas Aquinas]] eventually contributed to the development of a "humanist Aristotelianism" developed in the Renaissance, as exemplified in the thought of [[Pietro Pomponazzi]] and [[Giacomo Zabarella]]. Secondly, as an alternative to Aristotle, the study of [[Plato]] and the [[Neoplatonists]] became common. This was assisted by the rediscovery of works which had not been well known previously in Western Europe. Notable Renaissance Platonists include [[Nicholas of Cusa]], and later [[Marsilio Ficino]] and [[Giovanni Pico della Mirandola]].+[[Marxism]] is derived from the work of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]. Their idea that capitalism is based on exploitation of workers and causes alienation of people from their human nature, the [[historical materialism]], their view of [[social classes]], etc., have influenced many fields of study, such as sociology, economics, and politics. Marxism inspired the Marxist school of [[communism]], which brought a huge impact on the history of the 20th century.
-The Renaissance also renewed interest in anti-Aristotelian theories of nature considered as an organic, living whole comprehensible independently of theology, as in the work of [[Nicholas of Cusa]], [[Nicholas Copernicus]], [[Giordano Bruno]], [[Telesius]], and [[Tommaso Campanella]]. Such movements in natural philosophy dovetailed with a revival of interest in occultism, magic, [[hermeticism]], and [[astrology]], which were thought to yield hidden ways of knowing and mastering nature (e.g., in Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola).+===Aesthetics===
 +:''[[aesthetics]], [[moral philosophy]], [[political philosophy]]''
 +Aesthetics deals with [[beauty]], [[art]], enjoyment, sensory-emotional values, perception, and matters of taste and sentiment.
-These new movements in philosophy developed contemporaneously with larger religious and political transformations in Europe: the [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]] and the decline of [[feudalism]]. Though the theologians of the Protestant Reformation showed little direct interest in philosophy, their destruction of the traditional foundations of theological and intellectual authority harmonized with a revival of [[fideism]] and skepticism in thinkers such as [[Erasmus]], [[Montaigne]], and [[Francisco Sanches]]. Meanwhile, the gradual centralization of political power in nation-states was echoed by the emergence of secular political philosophies, as in the works of [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] (often described as the first modern political thinker, or a key turning point towards modern political thinking), [[Thomas More]], [[Erasmus]], [[Justus Lipsius]], [[Jean Bodin]], and [[Hugo Grotius]].+===Specialized branches===
 +* '''[[Philosophy of language]]''' explores the nature, the origins, and the use of language.
 +* '''[[Philosophy of law]]''' (often called '''[[jurisprudence]]''') explores the varying theories explaining the nature and the interpretations of the law in society.
 +* '''[[Philosophy of mind]]''' explores the nature of the mind, and its relationship to the body, and is typified by disputes between [[Dualism (philosophy of mind)|dualism]] and [[materialism]]. In recent years there has been increasing similarity between this branch of philosophy and [[cognitive science]].
 +* '''[[Philosophy of religion]]'''
 +* '''[[Philosophy of science]]'''
 +* '''[[Metaphilosophy]]'''
-====East Asia====+Many academic disciplines have also generated philosophical inquiry. These include [[Philosophy of History|history]], [[philosophy of logic|logic]], and [[Philosophy of mathematics|mathematics]].
-[[Mid-Imperial China|Mid-Imperial Chinese]] philosophy is primarily defined by the development of [[Neo-Confucianism]]. During the [[Tang Dynasty]], [[Buddhism]] from [[Buddhism in Nepal|Nepal]] also became a prominent philosophical and religious discipline. (It should be noted that philosophy and religion were clearly distinguished in the West, whilst these concepts were more continuous in the East due to, for example, the philosophical concepts of Buddhism.) 
-[[Neo-Confucianism]] is a philosophical movement that advocated a more rationalist and secular form of [[Confucianism]] by rejecting superstitious and mystical elements of [[Daoism]] and [[Buddhism]] that had influenced Confucianism during and after the Han Dynasty. Although the Neo-Confucianists were critical of Daoism and Buddhism, the two did have an influence on the philosophy, and the Neo-Confucianists borrowed terms and concepts from both. However, unlike the Buddhists and Daoists, who saw [[metaphysics]] as a catalyst for spiritual development, religious enlightenment, and immortality, the Neo-Confucianists used metaphysics as a guide for developing a rationalist [[ethics|ethical]] philosophy. 
-Neo-Confucianism has its origins in the [[Tang Dynasty]]; the Confucianist scholars [[Han Yu]] and [[Li Ao]] are seen as forbears of the Neo-Confucianists of the Song Dynasty. The Song Dynasty philosopher [[Zhou Dunyi]] is seen as the first true "pioneer" of Neo-Confucianism, using Daoist metaphysics as a framework for his ethical philosophy.+== See also ==
-Elsewhere in East Asia, [[Japanese Philosophy]] began to develop as indigenous [[Shinto]] beliefs fused with [[Buddhism]], [[Confucianism]] and other schools of [[Chinese philosophy]] and [[Indian philosophy]]. Similar to Japan, in [[Korean philosophy]] the emotional content of [[Korean Shamanism|Shamanism]] was integrated into the [[Korean Confucianism|Neo-Confucianism]] imported from China.+* [[Analytic philosophy]]
 +* [[Anti-philosophy]]
 +* [[19th century philosophy]]
 +* [[20th century philosophy]]
 +* [[Continental philosophy]]
 +* [[Deaths of philosophers ]]
 +* [[Desiring-production]]
 +* [[Embodied philosophy]]
 +* [[Epicureanism]]
 +* [[General economy]]
 +* [[Haecceity]]
 +* [[Hedonism]]
 +* [[Kant and Sade: The Ideal Couple]] by [[Zizek]]
 +* [[Lists of philosophers]]
 +* [[List of philosophy journals]]
 +* [[Major philosophical traditions]]
 +* [[Map–territory relation]]
 +* [[Postmodern philosophy]]
 +* [[Process philosophy]]
 +* [[Philosophy and literature]]
 +* [[Philosophy and film]]
 +* [[Political philosophy]]
 +* ''[[Philosophy in the Bedroom]]'' by [[Sade]]
 +* [[Twentieth-century French philosophy]]
 +* [[Theory]]
 +* [[Toilet philosophy]]
 +* [[Social theory]]
 +* [[Sophia]]
 +* [[Transcendentals]]
 +* [[Unsolved problems in philosophy]]
 +* [[Western philosophy]]
 +* ''[[The Philosophers' Football Match]]''
-====India====+===By field===
-The period between 5th and 9th century CE was the most brilliant epoch in the development of Indian philosophy as Hindu and Buddhist philosophies flourished side by side. Of these various schools of thought the non-dualistic [[Advaita Vedanta]] emerged as the most influential and most dominant school of philosophy. The major philosophers of this school were [[Gaudapada]], [[Adi Shankara]] and [[Vidyaranya]].+
- +
-Advaita Vedanta rejects theism and dualism by insisting that “[[Brahman]] [ultimate reality] is without parts or attributes…one without a second.” Since, Brahman has no properties, contains no internal diversity and is identical with the whole reality it cannot be understood as God. Brahman though being indescribable is at best described as Satchidananda (merging "Sat" + "Chit" + "Ananda", i.e., Existence, Consciousness and Bliss) by Shankara. Advaita ushered a new era in Indian philosophy and as a result, many new schools of thought arose in the medieval period. Some of them were [[Visishtadvaita]] (qualified monism), [[Dvaita]] (dualism), [[Dvaitadvaita]] (dualism-nondualism), [[Suddhadvaita]] (pure non-dualism), [[Achintya Bheda Abheda]] and [[Pratyabhijna|Pratyabhijña]] (the recognitive school).+
- +
-====Middle East====+
-In early Islamic thought, which refers to philosophy during the "[[Islamic Golden Age]]", traditionally dated between the 8th and 12th centuries, two main currents may be distinguished. The first is [[Kalam]], that mainly dealt with [[Islamic theology|Islamic theological]] questions. These include the [[Mu'tazili]] and [[Ash'ari]]. The other is [[#Falsafa|Falsafa]], that was founded on interpretations of [[Aristotelianism]] and [[Neoplatonism]]. There were attempts by later philosopher-theologians at harmonizing both trends, notably by [[Avicenna|Ibn Sina (Avicenna)]] who founded the school of [[Avicennism]], [[Averroes|Ibn Rushd (Averroës)]] who founded the school of [[Averroism]], and others such as [[Alhacen|Ibn al-Haytham (Alhacen)]] and [[Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī]].+
- +
-===17th–21st centuries===+
-====Early modern philosophy====+
- +
-Chronologically, the early modern era of Western philosophy is usually identified with the 17th and 18th centuries, with the 18th century often being referred to as the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]]. Modern philosophy is distinguished from its predecessors by its increasing independence from traditional authorities such as the Church, academia, and Aristotelianism; a new focus on the foundations of knowledge and metaphysical system-building; and the emergence of modern physics out of natural philosophy. Other central topics of philosophy in this period include the nature of the mind and its relation to the body, the implications of the new natural sciences for traditional theological topics such as free will and God, and the emergence of a secular basis for moral and political philosophy. These trends first distinctively coalesce in [[Francis Bacon]]'s call for a new, empirical program for expanding knowledge, and soon found massively influential form in the mechanical physics and rationalist metaphysics of [[Rene Descartes]]. [[Thomas Hobbes]] was the first to apply this methodology systematically to [[political philosophy]] and is the originator of modern political philosophy, including the modern theory of a "[[social contract]]". The academic canon of early modern philosophy generally includes [[Descartes]], [[Spinoza]], [[Leibniz]], [[John Locke|Locke]], [[George Berkeley|Berkeley]], [[David Hume|Hume]], and [[Kant]], though influential contributions to philosophy were made by many thinkers in this period, such as [[Galileo Galilei]], [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[Blaise Pascal]], [[Nicolas Malebranche]], [[Isaac Newton]], [[Christian Wolff (philosopher)|Christian Wolff]], [[Montesquieu]], [[Pierre Bayle]], [[Thomas Reid]], [[Jean d'Alembert]], and [[Adam Smith]]. [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] was a seminal figure in initiating reaction against the Enlightenment. The approximate end of the early modern period is most often identified with [[Immanuel Kant]]'s systematic attempt to limit metaphysics, justify scientific knowledge, and reconcile both of these with morality and freedom.+
- +
-====19th-century philosophy====+
- +
-Later modern philosophy is usually considered to begin after the philosophy of [[Immanuel Kant]] at the beginning of the 19th century. German philosophy exercised broad influence in this century, owing in part to the dominance of the German university system. [[German idealist]]s, such as [[Johann Gottlieb Fichte]], [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], and [[Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling]], transformed the work of Kant by maintaining that the world is constituted by a rational or mind-like process, and as such is entirely knowable. [[Arthur Schopenhauer]]'s identification of this world-constituting process as an irrational [[will to live]] influenced later 19th- and early 20th-century thinking, such as the work of [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] and [[Sigmund Freud]].+
- +
-After Hegel's death in 1831, 19th-century philosophy largely turned against idealism in favor of varieties of philosophical [[naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]], such as the [[positivism]] of [[Auguste Comte]], the empiricism of [[John Stuart Mill]], and the materialism of [[Karl Marx]]. Logic began a period of its most significant advances since the inception of the discipline, as increasing mathematical precision opened entire fields of inference to formalization in the work of [[George Boole]] and [[Gottlob Frege]]. Other philosophers who initiated lines of thought that would continue to shape philosophy into the 20th century include+
- +
-* [[Gottlob Frege]] and [[Henry Sidgwick]], whose work in logic and ethics, respectively, provided the tools for early [[analytic philosophy]].+
-* [[Charles Sanders Peirce]] and [[William James]], who founded [[pragmatism]].+
-* [[Søren Kierkegaard]] and [[Friedrich Nietzsche]], who laid the groundwork for [[existentialism]] and [[post-structuralism]].+
- +
-====20th-century philosophy====+
-Within the last century, philosophy has increasingly become a professional discipline practiced within universities, like other academic disciplines. Accordingly, it has become less general and more specialized. In the view of one prominent recent historian: "Philosophy has become a highly organized discipline, done by specialists primarily for other specialists. The number of philosophers has exploded, the volume of publication has swelled, and the subfields of serious philosophical investigation have multiplied. Not only is the broad field of philosophy today far too vast to be embraced by one mind, something similar is true even of many highly specialized subfields."+
- +
-In the English-speaking world, [[analytic philosophy]] became the dominant school for much of the 20th century. In the first half of the century, it was a cohesive school, shaped strongly by [[logical positivism]], united by the notion that philosophical problems could and should be solved by attention to [[logic]] and [[language]]. The pioneering work of [[Bertrand Russell]] was a model for the early development of analytic philosophy, moving from a rejection of the idealism dominant in late 19th century British philosophy to an neo-Humean empiricism, strengthened by the conceptual resources of modern mathematical logic. In the latter half of the 20th century, [[analytic philosophy]] diffused into a wide variety of disparate philosophical views, only loosely united by historical lines of influence and a self-identified commitment to clarity and rigor. The post-war transformation of the analytic program led in two broad directions: on one hand, an interest in ordinary language as a way of avoiding or redescribing traditional philosophical problems, and on the other, a more thoroughgoing [[naturalized epistemology|naturalism]] that sought to dissolve the puzzles of modern philosophy via the results of the natural sciences (such as cognitive psychology and evolutionary biology). The shift in the work of [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]], from a view congruent with logical positivism to a therapeutic dissolution of traditional philosophy as a linguistic misunderstanding of normal forms of life, was the most influential version of the first direction in analytic philosophy. The later work of Russell and the philosophy of [[W.V.O. Quine]] are influential exemplars of the naturalist approach dominant in the second half of the 20th century. But the diversity of analytic philosophy from the 1970s onward defies easy generalization: the naturalism of Quine and his epigoni was in some precincts superseded by a "new metaphysics" of [[possible worlds]], as in the influential work of [[David Kellogg Lewis|David Lewis]]. Recently, the [[experimental philosophy]] movement has sought to reappraise philosophical problems through social science research techniques.+
- +
-On continental Europe, no single school or temperament enjoyed dominance. The flight of the logical positivists from central Europe during the 1930s and 1940s, however, diminished philosophical interest in natural science, and an emphasis on the humanities, broadly construed, figures prominently in what is usually called "[[continental philosophy]]". 20th century movements such as [[phenomenology (philosophy)|phenomenology]], [[existentialism]], modern [[hermeneutics]], [[critical theory]], [[structuralism]], and [[poststructuralism]] are included within this loose category. The founder of phenomenology, [[Edmund Husserl]], sought to study consciousness as experienced from a first-person perspective, while [[Martin Heidegger]] drew on the ideas of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Husserl to propose an unconventional [[existential]] approach to [[ontology]].+
- +
-In the Arab-speaking world [[Arab nationalist]] philosophy became the dominant school of thought, involving philosophers such as [[Michel Aflaq]], [[Zaki al-Arsuzi]], [[Salah al-Din al-Bitar]] of [[ba'athism]] and [[Sati' al-Husri]]. These people disregarded much of Marx's research, and were mostly concerned with the individual's spirituality which would, in the fight against imperialism and oppression, lead to a united [[Arab Nation]].+
- +
-== See also ==+
-*[[Anti-philosophy]]+
-*[[19th century philosophy]]+
-*[[20th century philosophy]]+
-*[[Continental philosophy]]+
-*[[Map–territory relation]]+
*[[Philosophy of language]] *[[Philosophy of language]]
-*[[General economy]] 
-*[[Desiring-production]] 
-*[[Twentieth-century French philosophy]] 
-*[[Theory]] 
-*[[Western philosophy]] 
-*[[Postmodern philosophy]] 
-*[[Haecceity]] 
-*[[Process philosophy]] 
-*[[Philosophy and literature]] 
-*[[Philosophy and film]] 
-*[[Embodied philosophy]] 
-*[[Toilet philosophy]] 
-*[[Kant and Sade: The Ideal Couple]] by [[Zizek]] 
-*''[[Philosophy in the Bedroom]]'' by [[Sade]] 
-===By field=== 
*[[Philosophy of laughter]] *[[Philosophy of laughter]]
 +*[[Philosophy of religion]]
*[[Philosophy of sex]] *[[Philosophy of sex]]
*[[Philosophy of horror]] *[[Philosophy of horror]]
- 
-==See also== 
- 
-* [[Lists of philosophers]] 
-* [[List of philosophy journals]] 
-* [[Unsolved problems in philosophy]] 
-* [[Political philosophy]] 
-* [[Social theory]] 
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 21:07, 21 November 2018

Friedrich Nietzsche (c. 1875)

"(Philosophy is) the yelping hound howling at her lord (poetry) [...] " --Plato, The Republic


"Nothing is more usual than for philosophers to encroach on the province of grammarians, and to engage in disputes of words, while they imagine they are handling controversies of the deepest importance and concern." - David Hume

Plato (left) and Aristotle (right), a detail of The School of Athens, a fresco by Raphael. Aristotle gestures to the earth, representing his belief in knowledge through empirical observation and experience, while holding a copy of his Nicomachean Ethics in his hand. Plato holds his Timaeus and gestures to the heavens, representing his belief in The Forms
Enlarge
Plato (left) and Aristotle (right), a detail of The School of Athens, a fresco by Raphael. Aristotle gestures to the earth, representing his belief in knowledge through empirical observation and experience, while holding a copy of his Nicomachean Ethics in his hand. Plato holds his Timaeus and gestures to the heavens, representing his belief in The Forms
By virtue of his magnum opus, the posthumous Ethics, Spinoza is considered one of Western philosophy's definitive ethicists.
Enlarge
By virtue of his magnum opus, the posthumous Ethics, Spinoza is considered one of Western philosophy's definitive ethicists.
Thérèse Philosophe (1748) was the bestseller of the French Enlightenment
Enlarge
Thérèse Philosophe (1748) was the bestseller of the French Enlightenment

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on rational argument. In more casual speech, by extension, "philosophy" can refer to the most basic belief system of an individual or group.

The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek φιλοσοφία (philosophia), which literally means "love of wisdom". The introduction of the terms "philosopher" and "philosophy" has been ascribed to the Greek thinker Pythagoras.

Contents

History

history of philosophy

Many societies have considered philosophical questions and built philosophical traditions based upon each other's works.

Eastern philosophy is organized by the chronological periods of each region. Historians of western philosophy usually divide the subject into three or more periods, the most important being ancient philosophy, medieval philosophy, and modern philosophy.

Areas of inquiry

Philosophy is divided into many sub-fields. These include epistemology, logic, metaphysics, ethics, and aesthetics. Some of the major areas of study are considered individually below.

Epistemology

Epistemology

Epistemology is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge, such as the relationships between truth, belief, and theories of justification.

Skepticism is the position which questions the possibility of completely justifying any truth. The regress argument, a fundamental problem in epistemology, occurs when, in order to completely prove any statement P, its justification itself needs to be supported by another justification. This chain can do three possible options, all of which are unsatisfactory according to the Münchhausen trilemma. One option is infinitism, where this chain of justification can go on forever. Another option is foundationalism, where the chain of justifications eventually relies on basic beliefs or axioms that are left unproven. The last option, such as in coherentism, is making the chain circular so that a statement is included in its own chain of justification.

Rationalism is the emphasis on reasoning as a source of knowledge. Empiricism is the emphasis on observational evidence via sensory experience over other evidence as the source of knowledge. Rationalism claims that every possible object of knowledge can be deduced from coherent premises without observation. Empiricism claims that at least some knowledge is only a matter of observation. For this, Empiricism often cites the concept of tabula rasa, where individuals are not born with mental content and that knowledge builds from experience or perception. Epistemological solipsism is the idea that the existence of the world outside the mind is an unresolvable question.

Parmenides (fl. 500 BC) argued that it is impossible to doubt that thinking actually occurs. But thinking must have an object, therefore something beyond thinking really exists. Parmenides deduced that what really exists must have certain properties—for example, that it cannot come into existence or cease to exist, that it is a coherent whole, that it remains the same eternally (in fact, exists altogether outside time). This is known as the third man argument. Plato (427–347 BC) combined rationalism with a form of realism. The philosopher's work is to consider being, and the essence (ousia) of things. But the characteristic of essences is that they are universal. The nature of a man, a triangle, a tree, applies to all men, all triangles, all trees. Plato argued that these essences are mind-independent "forms", that humans (but particularly philosophers) can come to know by reason, and by ignoring the distractions of sense-perception.

Modern rationalism begins with Descartes. Reflection on the nature of perceptual experience, as well as scientific discoveries in physiology and optics, led Descartes (and also Locke) to the view that we are directly aware of ideas, rather than objects. This view gave rise to three questions:

  1. Is an idea a true copy of the real thing that it represents? Sensation is not a direct interaction between bodily objects and our sense, but is a physiological process involving representation (for example, an image on the retina). Locke thought that a "secondary quality" such as a sensation of green could in no way resemble the arrangement of particles in matter that go to produce this sensation, although he thought that "primary qualities" such as shape, size, number, were really in objects.
  2. How can physical objects such as chairs and tables, or even physiological processes in the brain, give rise to mental items such as ideas? This is part of what became known as the mind-body problem.
  3. If all the contents of awareness are ideas, how can we know that anything exists apart from ideas?

Descartes tried to address the last problem by reason. He began, echoing Parmenides, with a principle that he thought could not coherently be denied: I think, therefore I am (often given in his original Latin: Cogito ergo sum). From this principle, Descartes went on to construct a complete system of knowledge (which involves proving the existence of God, using, among other means, a version of the ontological argument). His view that reason alone could yield substantial truths about reality strongly influenced those philosophers usually considered modern rationalists (such as Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Leibniz, and Christian Wolff), while provoking criticism from other philosophers who have retrospectively come to be grouped together as empiricists.

Logic

logic

Logic is the study of the principles of correct reasoning. Arguments use either deductive reasoning or inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is when, given certain statements (called premises), other statements (called conclusions) are unavoidably implied. Rules of inferences from premises include the most popular method, modus ponens, where given “A” and “If A then B”, then “B” must be concluded. A common convention for a deductive argument is the syllogism. An argument is termed valid if its conclusion does indeed follow from its premises, whether the premises are true or not, while an argument is sound if its conclusion follows from premises that are true. Propositional logic uses premises that are propositions, which are declarations that are either true or false, while predicate logic uses more complex premises called formulae that contain variables. These can be assigned values or can be quantified as to when they apply with the universal quantifier (always apply) or the existential quantifier (applies at least once). Inductive reasoning makes conclusions or generalizations based on probabilistic reasoning. For example, if “90% of humans are right-handed” and “Joe is human” then “Joe is probably right-handed”. Fields in logic include mathematical logic (formal symbolic logic) and philosophical logic.

Metaphysics

metaphysics

Metaphysics is the study of the most general features of reality, such as existence, time, the relationship between mind and body, objects and their properties, wholes and their parts, events, processes, and causation. Traditional branches of metaphysics include cosmology, the study of the world in its entirety, and ontology, the study of being.

Within metaphysics itself there are a wide range of differing philosophical theories. Idealism, for example, is the belief that reality is mentally constructed or otherwise immaterial while realism holds that reality, or at least some part of it, exists independently of the mind. Subjective idealism describes objects as no more than collections or "bundles" of sense data in the perceiver. The 18th century philosopher George Berkeley contended that existence is fundamentally tied to perception with the phrase Esse est aut percipi aut percipere or "To be is to be perceived or to perceive".

In addition to the aforementioned views, however, there is also an ontological dichotomy within metaphysics between the concepts of particulars and universals as well. Particulars are those objects that are said to exist in space and time, as opposed to abstract objects, such as numbers. Universals are properties held by multiple particulars, such as redness or a gender. The type of existence, if any, of universals and abstract objects is an issue of serious debate within metaphysical philosophy. Realism is the philosophical position that universals do in fact exist, while nominalism is the negation, or denial of universals, abstract objects, or both. Conceptualism holds that universals exist, but only within the mind's perception.

The question of whether or not existence is a predicate has been discussed since the Early Modern period. Essence is the set of attributes that make an object what it fundamentally is and without which it loses its identity. Essence is contrasted with accident: a property that the substance has contingently, without which the substance can still retain its identity.

Moral and political philosophy

moral philosophy, political philosophy

Ethics, or "moral philosophy," is concerned primarily with the question of the best way to live, and secondarily, concerning the question of whether this question can be answered. The main branches of ethics are meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics. Meta-ethics concerns the nature of ethical thought, such as the origins of the words good and bad, and origins of other comparative words of various ethical systems, whether there are absolute ethical truths, and how such truths could be known. Normative ethics are more concerned with the questions of how one ought to act, and what the right course of action is. This is where most ethical theories are generated. Lastly, applied ethics go beyond theory and step into real world ethical practice, such as questions of whether or not abortion is correct. Ethics is also associated with the idea of morality, and the two are often interchangeable.

One debate that has commanded the attention of ethicists in the modern era has been between consequentialism (actions are to be morally evaluated solely by their consequences) and deontology (actions are to be morally evaluated solely by consideration of agents' duties, the rights of those whom the action concerns, or both). Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are famous for propagating utilitarianism, which is the idea that the fundamental moral rule is to strive toward the "greatest happiness for the greatest number". However, in promoting this idea they also necessarily promoted the broader doctrine of consequentialism. Adopting a position opposed to consequentialism, Immanuel Kant argued that moral principles were simply products of reason. Kant believed that the incorporation of consequences into moral deliberation was a deep mistake, since it denies the necessity of practical maxims in governing the working of the will. According to Kant, reason requires that we conform our actions to the categorical imperative, which is an absolute duty. An important 20th-century deontologist, W.D. Ross, argued for weaker forms of duties called prima facie duties.

More recent works have emphasized the role of character in ethics, a movement known as the aretaic turn (that is, the turn towards virtues). One strain of this movement followed the work of Bernard Williams. Williams noted that rigid forms of consequentialism and deontology demanded that people behave impartially. This, Williams argued, requires that people abandon their personal projects, and hence their personal integrity, in order to be considered moral. G.E.M. Anscombe, in an influential paper, "Modern Moral Philosophy" (1958), revived virtue ethics as an alternative to what was seen as the entrenched positions of Kantianism and consequentialism. Aretaic perspectives have been inspired in part by research of ancient conceptions of virtue. For example, Aristotle's ethics demands that people follow the Aristotelian mean, or balance between two vices; and Confucian ethics argues that virtue consists largely in striving for harmony with other people. Virtue ethics in general has since gained many adherents, and has been defended by such philosophers as Philippa Foot, Alasdair MacIntyre, and Rosalind Hursthouse.

Political philosophy is the study of government and the relationship of individuals (or families and clans) to communities including the state. It includes questions about justice, law, property, and the rights and obligations of the citizen. Politics and ethics are traditionally inter-linked subjects, as both discuss the question of what is good and how people should live.

From ancient times, and well beyond them, the roots of justification for political authority were inescapably tied to outlooks on human nature. In The Republic, Plato presented the argument that the ideal society would be run by a council of philosopher-kings, since those best at philosophy are best able to realize the good. Even Plato, however, required philosophers to make their way in the world for many years before beginning their rule at the age of fifty. For Aristotle, humans are political animals (i.e. social animals), and governments are set up to pursue good for the community. Aristotle reasoned that, since the state (polis) was the highest form of community, it has the purpose of pursuing the highest good. Aristotle viewed political power as the result of natural inequalities in skill and virtue. Because of these differences, he favored an aristocracy of the able and virtuous. For Aristotle, the person cannot be complete unless he or she lives in a community. His The Nicomachean Ethics and The Politics are meant to be read in that order. The first book addresses virtues (or "excellences") in the person as a citizen; the second addresses the proper form of government to ensure that citizens will be virtuous, and therefore complete. Both books deal with the essential role of justice in civic life.

Nicolas of Cusa rekindled Platonic thought in the early 15th century. He promoted democracy in Medieval Europe, both in his writings and in his organization of the Council of Florence. Unlike Aristotle and the Hobbesian tradition to follow, Cusa saw human beings as equal and divine (that is, made in God's image), so democracy would be the only just form of government. Cusa's views are credited by some as sparking the Italian Renaissance, which gave rise to the notion of "Nation-States".

Later, Niccolò Machiavelli rejected the views of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas as unrealistic. The ideal sovereign is not the embodiment of the moral virtues; rather the sovereign does whatever is successful and necessary, rather than what is morally praiseworthy. Thomas Hobbes also contested many elements of Aristotle's views. For Hobbes, human nature is essentially anti-social: people are essentially egoistic, and this egoism makes life difficult in the natural state of things. Moreover, Hobbes argued, though people may have natural inequalities, these are trivial, since no particular talents or virtues that people may have will make them safe from harm inflicted by others. For these reasons, Hobbes concluded that the state arises from a common agreement to raise the community out of the state of nature. This can only be done by the establishment of a sovereign, in which (or whom) is vested complete control over the community, and is able to inspire awe and terror in its subjects.

Many in the Enlightenment were unsatisfied with existing doctrines in political philosophy, which seemed to marginalize or neglect the possibility of a democratic state. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was among those who attempted to overturn these doctrines: he responded to Hobbes by claiming that a human is by nature a kind of "noble savage", and that society and social contracts corrupt this nature. Another critic was John Locke. In Second Treatise on Government he agreed with Hobbes that the nation-state was an efficient tool for raising humanity out of a deplorable state, but he argued that the sovereign might become an abominable institution compared to the relatively benign unmodulated state of nature.

Following the doctrine of the fact-value distinction, due in part to the influence of David Hume and his student Adam Smith, appeals to human nature for political justification were weakened. Nevertheless, many political philosophers, especially moral realists, still make use of some essential human nature as a basis for their arguments.

Marxism is derived from the work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Their idea that capitalism is based on exploitation of workers and causes alienation of people from their human nature, the historical materialism, their view of social classes, etc., have influenced many fields of study, such as sociology, economics, and politics. Marxism inspired the Marxist school of communism, which brought a huge impact on the history of the 20th century.

Aesthetics

aesthetics, moral philosophy, political philosophy

Aesthetics deals with beauty, art, enjoyment, sensory-emotional values, perception, and matters of taste and sentiment.

Specialized branches

Many academic disciplines have also generated philosophical inquiry. These include history, logic, and mathematics.


See also

By field




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Philosophy" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools