Law of excluded middle  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:36, 16 August 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 16:03, 21 December 2014
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-:''[[first principle]], [[pleasure principle]]'' 
-A '''principle''' signifies a point (or points) of probability on a subject (e.g., the principle of creativity), which allows for the formation of [[rule]] or [[norm (philosophy)|norm]] or law by (human) interpretation of the phenomena (events) that can be created. The rules, norms and laws depend on and co-create a particular context to formulate. A principle is the underlying part (or spirit) of the basis for an evolutionary normative or formative development, which is the object of subjective experience and/or interpretation. For example, the [[ethics]] of someone may be seen as a set of principles that the individual obeys in the form of rules, as guidance or law. These principles thus form the basis for such ethics.  
-Reducing a rule to its principle says that, for the purpose at hand, the principle will not / cannot be questioned or further derived (unless you create new rules). This is a convenient way of reducing the complexity of an argumentation.+In [[logic]], the '''law of excluded middle''' (or the '''principle of excluded middle''') is the third of the [[three classic laws of thought]]. It states that for any [[proposition]], either that proposition is true, or its [[negation]] is true.
 + 
 +The law is also known as the '''law''' (or '''principle''') '''of the excluded third''', in [[Latin]] '''''principium tertii exclusi'''''. Yet another Latin designation for this law is '''''tertium non datur''''': "no third (possibility) is given".
 + 
 +The earliest known formulation is Aristotle's [[principle of non-contradiction]], first proposed in ''[[On Interpretation]],'' where he says that of two [[contradictory]] propositions (i.e. where one proposition is the negation of the other) one must be true, and the other false. He also states it as a principle in the ''[[Metaphysics (Aristotle)|Metaphysics]]'' book 3, saying that it is necessary in every case to affirm or deny, and that it is impossible that there should be anything between the two parts of a contradiction. The principle was stated as a [[theorem]] of [[propositional calculus|propositional logic]] by [[Bertrand Russell|Russell]] and [[Alfred North Whitehead|Whitehead]] in ''[[Principia Mathematica]]'' as:
 + 
 +<math>\mathbf{*2\cdot11}. \ \ \vdash . \ p \ \vee \thicksim p</math>.
 + 
 +The principle should not be confused with the semantical [[principle of bivalence]], which states that every proposition is either true or false.
 + 
 +== References ==
 +* [[Thomas Aquinas|Aquinas, Thomas]], "[[Summa Theologica]]", [[Fathers of the English Dominican Province]] (trans.), [[Daniel J. Sullivan]] (ed.), vols. 19–20 in [[Robert Maynard Hutchins]] (ed.), ''[[Great Books of the Western World]]'', Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., Chicago, IL, 1952. Cited as GB 19–20.
 +* [[Aristotle]], "[[Metaphysics (Aristotle)|Metaphysics]]", [[W.D. Ross]] (trans.), vol. 8 in [[Robert Maynard Hutchins]] (ed.), ''[[Great Books of the Western World]]'', Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., Chicago, IL, 1952. Cited as GB 8. 1st published, W.D. Ross (trans.), ''The Works of Aristotle'', Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
 +* [[Martin Davis]] 2000, ''Engines of Logic: Mathematicians and the Origin of the Computer", W. W. Norton & Company, NY, ISBN 0-393-32229-7 pbk.
 +* [[John Dawson Jr.|Dawson, J.]], ''Logical Dilemmas, The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel'', A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1997.
 +* [[Jean van Heijenoort|van Heijenoort, J.]], ''From Frege to Gödel, A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931'', Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967. Reprinted with corrections, 1977.
 +* Luitzen Egbertus Jan [[Brouwer]], 1923, ''On the significance of the principle of excluded middle in mathematics, especially in function theory'' [reprinted with commentary, p.&nbsp;334, van Heijenoort]
 +* Andrei Nikolaevich [[Kolmogorov]], 1925, ''On the principle of excluded middle'', [reprinted with commentary, p.&nbsp;414, van Heijenoort]
 +* Luitzen Egbertus Jan [[Brouwer]], 1927, ''On the domains of definitions of functions'',[reprinted with commentary, p.&nbsp;446, van Heijenoort] Although not directly germane, in his (1923) Brouwer uses certain words defined in this paper.
 +* Luitzen Egbertus Jan [[Brouwer]], 1927(2), ''Intuitionistic reflections on formalism'',[reprinted with commentary, p.&nbsp;490, van Heijenoort]
 +* [[Stephen C. Kleene]] 1952 original printing, 1971 6th printing with corrections, 10th printing 1991, ''Introduction to Metamathematics'', North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam NY, ISBN 0-7204-2103-9.
 +* [[William Kneale|Kneale, W.]] and [[Martha Kneale|Kneale, M.]], ''The Development of Logic'', Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1962. Reprinted with corrections, 1975.
 +* [[Alfred North Whitehead]] and [[Bertrand Russell]], ''Principia Mathematica to *56'', Cambridge at the University Press 1962 (Second Edition of 1927, reprinted). Extremely difficult because of arcane symbolism, but a must-have for serious logicians.
 +* [[Bertrand Russell]], ''An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth''. The William James Lectures for 1940 Delivered at Harvard University.
 +* [[Bertrand Russell]], ''The Problems of Philosophy, With a New Introduction by John Perry'', Oxford University Press, New York, 1997 edition (first published 1912). Very easy to read: Russell was a wonderful writer.
 +* [[Bertrand Russell]], ''The Art of Philosophizing and Other Essays'', Littlefield, Adams & Co., Totowa, NJ, 1974 edition (first published 1968). Includes a wonderful essay on "The Art of drawing Inferences".
 +* [[Hans Reichenbach]], ''Elements of Symbolic Logic'', Dover, New York, 1947, 1975.
 +* [[Tom M. Mitchell|Tom Mitchell]], ''Machine Learning'', WCB McGraw-Hill, 1997.
 +* [[Constance Reid]], ''Hilbert'', Copernicus: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1996, first published 1969. Contains a wealth of biographical information, much derived from interviews.
 +* [[Bart Kosko]], ''Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic'', Hyperion, New York, 1993. Fuzzy thinking at its finest. But a good introduction to the concepts.
 +* [[David Hume]], ''An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding'', reprinted in Great Books of the Western World Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 35, 1952, p.&nbsp;449 ff. This work was published by Hume in 1758 as his rewrite of his "juvenile" ''Treatise of Human Nature: Being An attempt to introduce the experimental method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects Vol. I, Of The Understanding'' first published 1739, reprinted as: David Hume, ''A Treatise of Human Nature'', Penguin Classics, 1985. Also see: [[David Applebaum]], ''The Vision of Hume'', Vega, London, 2001: a reprint of a portion of ''An Inquiry'' starts on p.&nbsp;94 ff
 + 
-The point of principle allows to create all probable versions under its subjective theme, as its reality creation/evolvement under that subject is open-ended and unpredictable relying on choice and option. Rules and laws capture a consensus that certain actions and events will occur under a principle (or a combination of principles). 
-A principled view for example, implies that an individual has a firm understanding of the underlying principle(s) of events and the rules and laws which govern them inherently and according to our consensus. 
-==See also== 
-*[[Axiom]] 
-*[[Corollary]] 
-*[[Deduction]] 
-*[[Law of excluded middle]] 
-*[[Law of noncontradiction]] 
-*[[Logical consequence]] 
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 16:03, 21 December 2014

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

In logic, the law of excluded middle (or the principle of excluded middle) is the third of the three classic laws of thought. It states that for any proposition, either that proposition is true, or its negation is true.

The law is also known as the law (or principle) of the excluded third, in Latin principium tertii exclusi. Yet another Latin designation for this law is tertium non datur: "no third (possibility) is given".

The earliest known formulation is Aristotle's principle of non-contradiction, first proposed in On Interpretation, where he says that of two contradictory propositions (i.e. where one proposition is the negation of the other) one must be true, and the other false. He also states it as a principle in the Metaphysics book 3, saying that it is necessary in every case to affirm or deny, and that it is impossible that there should be anything between the two parts of a contradiction. The principle was stated as a theorem of propositional logic by Russell and Whitehead in Principia Mathematica as:

<math>\mathbf{*2\cdot11}. \ \ \vdash . \ p \ \vee \thicksim p</math>.

The principle should not be confused with the semantical principle of bivalence, which states that every proposition is either true or false.

References

  • Aquinas, Thomas, "Summa Theologica", Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.), Daniel J. Sullivan (ed.), vols. 19–20 in Robert Maynard Hutchins (ed.), Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., Chicago, IL, 1952. Cited as GB 19–20.
  • Aristotle, "Metaphysics", W.D. Ross (trans.), vol. 8 in Robert Maynard Hutchins (ed.), Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., Chicago, IL, 1952. Cited as GB 8. 1st published, W.D. Ross (trans.), The Works of Aristotle, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Martin Davis 2000, Engines of Logic: Mathematicians and the Origin of the Computer", W. W. Norton & Company, NY, ISBN 0-393-32229-7 pbk.
  • Dawson, J., Logical Dilemmas, The Life and Work of Kurt Gödel, A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA, 1997.
  • van Heijenoort, J., From Frege to Gödel, A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967. Reprinted with corrections, 1977.
  • Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, 1923, On the significance of the principle of excluded middle in mathematics, especially in function theory [reprinted with commentary, p. 334, van Heijenoort]
  • Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, 1925, On the principle of excluded middle, [reprinted with commentary, p. 414, van Heijenoort]
  • Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, 1927, On the domains of definitions of functions,[reprinted with commentary, p. 446, van Heijenoort] Although not directly germane, in his (1923) Brouwer uses certain words defined in this paper.
  • Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer, 1927(2), Intuitionistic reflections on formalism,[reprinted with commentary, p. 490, van Heijenoort]
  • Stephen C. Kleene 1952 original printing, 1971 6th printing with corrections, 10th printing 1991, Introduction to Metamathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam NY, ISBN 0-7204-2103-9.
  • Kneale, W. and Kneale, M., The Development of Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1962. Reprinted with corrections, 1975.
  • Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, Principia Mathematica to *56, Cambridge at the University Press 1962 (Second Edition of 1927, reprinted). Extremely difficult because of arcane symbolism, but a must-have for serious logicians.
  • Bertrand Russell, An Inquiry Into Meaning and Truth. The William James Lectures for 1940 Delivered at Harvard University.
  • Bertrand Russell, The Problems of Philosophy, With a New Introduction by John Perry, Oxford University Press, New York, 1997 edition (first published 1912). Very easy to read: Russell was a wonderful writer.
  • Bertrand Russell, The Art of Philosophizing and Other Essays, Littlefield, Adams & Co., Totowa, NJ, 1974 edition (first published 1968). Includes a wonderful essay on "The Art of drawing Inferences".
  • Hans Reichenbach, Elements of Symbolic Logic, Dover, New York, 1947, 1975.
  • Tom Mitchell, Machine Learning, WCB McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  • Constance Reid, Hilbert, Copernicus: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1996, first published 1969. Contains a wealth of biographical information, much derived from interviews.
  • Bart Kosko, Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic, Hyperion, New York, 1993. Fuzzy thinking at its finest. But a good introduction to the concepts.
  • David Hume, An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, reprinted in Great Books of the Western World Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 35, 1952, p. 449 ff. This work was published by Hume in 1758 as his rewrite of his "juvenile" Treatise of Human Nature: Being An attempt to introduce the experimental method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects Vol. I, Of The Understanding first published 1739, reprinted as: David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Penguin Classics, 1985. Also see: David Applebaum, The Vision of Hume, Vega, London, 2001: a reprint of a portion of An Inquiry starts on p. 94 ff





Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Law of excluded middle" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools