Genre theory, corpus and tautology  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:05, 25 August 2008
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 16:16, 24 September 2010
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 12: Line 12:
:So genre = characteristics = corpus = genre ----> tautology. :So genre = characteristics = corpus = genre ----> tautology.
-[[Donato Totaro]] has said almost the same when stating that:+[[Donato Totaro]] said almost the same when he stated in relation to the horror genre that:
-:"Admittingly, I am swimming into a tautological sea by assuming a general understanding of the horror genre. But a certain tautology is a necessary evil of genre theory, and I mean the latter more as a categorization rather than definition of the horror genre. Besides, I do agree with Noel Carroll's other not sufficient descriptions of "art-horror" (the quality of being "interstitial," ie. something that can not be categorized, as for example, vampires, mummies, zombies that are neither living nor dead; impurity, disgust, etc.)." --[[Donato Totaro]], 2000 via http://www.horschamp.qc.ca/9710/halloween_anglais/scare.html [Jun 2006] +:"Admittingly, I am swimming into a tautological sea by assuming a general understanding of the horror genre. But a certain tautology is a necessary evil of genre theory, and I mean the latter more as a categorization rather than definition of the horror genre. Besides, I do agree with [[Noel Carroll]]'s other not sufficient descriptions of "art-horror" (the quality of being "interstitial," ie. something that can not be categorized, as for example, vampires, mummies, zombies that are neither living nor dead; impurity, disgust, etc.)." --[[Donato Totaro]], 2000 via http://www.horschamp.qc.ca/9710/halloween_anglais/scare.html [Jun 2006]
-And repeated here by [[Jeffrey Sconce]] who repeats [[Andrew Tudor]]:+The argument is also repeated by [[Jeffrey Sconce]], after [[Andrew Tudor]]:
-:Much of the work in genre theory has devoted itself to avoiding tautological definitions of a group of films (ie westerns are westerns because they are set in the Old West, which means they are westerns — see Tudor 1995). --Esper, the renunciator: teaching ‘bad' movies to good students () Jeffrey Sconce quoted in Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste (2003) +:Much of the work in [[genre theory]] has devoted itself to avoiding tautological definitions of a group of films (ie westerns are westerns because they are set in the Old West, which means they are westerns — see Tudor 1995). --Esper, the renunciator: teaching ‘bad' movies to good students () Jeffrey Sconce quoted in Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste (2003)
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 16:16, 24 September 2010

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

see tautology, genre theory

One can easily argue that all genres are tautologies.

When trying to define a genre, we must look for characteristics of the genre.
The characteristics of a genre are found in the corpus of works that belong to the genre.
The corpus can only be found by defining the characteristics.
So genre = characteristics = corpus = genre ----> tautology.

Donato Totaro said almost the same when he stated in relation to the horror genre that:

"Admittingly, I am swimming into a tautological sea by assuming a general understanding of the horror genre. But a certain tautology is a necessary evil of genre theory, and I mean the latter more as a categorization rather than definition of the horror genre. Besides, I do agree with Noel Carroll's other not sufficient descriptions of "art-horror" (the quality of being "interstitial," ie. something that can not be categorized, as for example, vampires, mummies, zombies that are neither living nor dead; impurity, disgust, etc.)." --Donato Totaro, 2000 via http://www.horschamp.qc.ca/9710/halloween_anglais/scare.html [Jun 2006]

The argument is also repeated by Jeffrey Sconce, after Andrew Tudor:

Much of the work in genre theory has devoted itself to avoiding tautological definitions of a group of films (ie westerns are westerns because they are set in the Old West, which means they are westerns — see Tudor 1995). --Esper, the renunciator: teaching ‘bad' movies to good students () Jeffrey Sconce quoted in Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste (2003)




Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Genre theory, corpus and tautology" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools