Ethics of Human Bondage or the Strength of the Emotions  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:23, 26 December 2007
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 22:25, 26 December 2007
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template}} {{Template}}
-In the 1660s, the Dutch philosopher [[Spinoza]] writes, in his ''[[Ethics of Human Bondage or the Strength of the Emotions]]'', that the term “[[bondage]]” relates to the human infirmity in [[moderating]] and checking the emotions. That is, according to Spinoza ‘when a man is prey to his emotions, he is not his own master, but lies at the mercy of fortune.’+In the 1660s, the Dutch philosopher [[Spinoza]] writes, in his ''[[Ethics of Human Bondage or the Strength of the Emotions]]'' (a part of his [[Ethics (book)|Ethics]]), that the term “[[bondage]]” relates to the human infirmity in [[moderating]] and checking the emotions. That is, according to Spinoza ‘when a man is prey to his emotions, he is not his own master, but lies at the mercy of fortune.’
{{GFDL}} {{GFDL}}

Revision as of 22:25, 26 December 2007

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

In the 1660s, the Dutch philosopher Spinoza writes, in his Ethics of Human Bondage or the Strength of the Emotions (a part of his Ethics), that the term “bondage” relates to the human infirmity in moderating and checking the emotions. That is, according to Spinoza ‘when a man is prey to his emotions, he is not his own master, but lies at the mercy of fortune.’



Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Ethics of Human Bondage or the Strength of the Emotions" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools