Erotica vs. pornography debate
From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia
| Revision as of 10:16, 25 August 2010 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 10:17, 25 August 2010 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :"One person's [[erotica]] is another person's [[pornography]]." | :"One person's [[erotica]] is another person's [[pornography]]." | ||
| - | :"The difference between [erotica and pornography], apart from the moral/aesthetic judgement, largely rests on the intention of the person doing the "making". It is assumed that the pornographer produces pornography with the sole [[intention]] of causing people to feel sexually aroused, usually for [[commercial|financial gain]]. Erotica, however, may also have [[aesthetic]] or expressive purposes; there is less sense of the producer manipulating the feelings of the consumer, and less implication of purely financial motives. There is also a difference as regards the medium; the word "pornography" is nearly always applied to written texts, film and, primarily, photographs. One may say "an erotic statue", but probably not "a pornographic statue"." --[[Robin Turner]], ''[[Debating Pornography: Categories and Metaphors]]'' [http://neptune.spaceports.com/~words/debating.html] [May 2005] | ||
| The distinction between erotica and [[pornography]] (as well as the lesser known genre of sexual entertainment, [[ribaldry]]) is difficult to identify, if not completely impossible. Proponents for erotic art argue that such work is intended to arouse [[aesthetics|aesthetic]] rather than erotic feelings, and is therefore not pornographic. Opponents see this as a [[pretentious]] stand, as they believe that erotic art shares the same purposes as pornography. | The distinction between erotica and [[pornography]] (as well as the lesser known genre of sexual entertainment, [[ribaldry]]) is difficult to identify, if not completely impossible. Proponents for erotic art argue that such work is intended to arouse [[aesthetics|aesthetic]] rather than erotic feelings, and is therefore not pornographic. Opponents see this as a [[pretentious]] stand, as they believe that erotic art shares the same purposes as pornography. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
| *[[Etymologies of erotica and pornography]] | *[[Etymologies of erotica and pornography]] | ||
| *[[Eroticism is where you use a feather and pornography is where you use the whole chicken]] | *[[Eroticism is where you use a feather and pornography is where you use the whole chicken]] | ||
| - | + | *''[[Debating Pornography: Categories and Metaphors]]'' | |
| {{GFDL}} | {{GFDL}} | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 25 August 2010
|
Related e |
|
Featured: |
- Etymologies of erotica and pornography
- "One person's erotica is another person's pornography."
The distinction between erotica and pornography (as well as the lesser known genre of sexual entertainment, ribaldry) is difficult to identify, if not completely impossible. Proponents for erotic art argue that such work is intended to arouse aesthetic rather than erotic feelings, and is therefore not pornographic. Opponents see this as a pretentious stand, as they believe that erotic art shares the same purposes as pornography.
Stephen Gilbert once remarked "The difference between erotica and pornography is simple. Erotica is what I like. Pornography is what you like, you pervert!" One common joke is that "the only difference between art and pornography is a government grant." Another one by Isabel Allende is: "Erotica is when you use a feather. Pornography is when you use the whole chicken."
The issue of whether a distinction can be made between erotica and pornography raises multiple complicated questions. These questions include whether aesthetic and erotic feelings are mutually exclusive, how the level of commercialism and tastefulness in an artwork can be objectively measured, and at what point they make the work pornographic.
In general, "erotica" refers to portrayals of sexually arousing material that hold or aspire to artistic or scientific merit, whereas "pornography" often connotes the prurient depiction of sexual acts, with little or no artistic value.
See also
- Etymologies of erotica and pornography
- Eroticism is where you use a feather and pornography is where you use the whole chicken
- Debating Pornography: Categories and Metaphors
