Encyclopédie  

From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:59, 24 September 2009
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 11:08, 27 December 2009
Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 3: Line 3:
Its introduction, the ''[[Preliminary Discourse]]'', is considered an important exposition of [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] ideals. The ''Encyclopédie'''s self-professed aim was "to change the way people think." Its introduction, the ''[[Preliminary Discourse]]'', is considered an important exposition of [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] ideals. The ''Encyclopédie'''s self-professed aim was "to change the way people think."
 +== Contents ==
 +The introduction to the ''Encyclopédie'', D'Alembert's ''[[Preliminary Discourse]]'', is considered an important exposition of [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] ideals. Among other things, it presents a [[Figurative system of human knowledge|taxonomy of human knowledge]] (See fig.3) which was inspired by [[Francis Bacon]]'s ''[[Advancement of Knowledge]]''. The three main branches of knowledge are: "Memory"/History, "Reason"/Philosophy, and "Imagination"/Poetry. Notable is the fact that theology is ordered under 'Philosophy'. [[Robert Darnton]] argues that this categorisation of religion as being subject to human reason and not a source of knowledge in and of itself, was a significant factor in the controversy surrounding the work. Additionally, notice that 'Knowledge of God' is only a few nodes away from '[[Divination]]' and '[[Black Magic]]'.
 +
 +Likewise, many contributors saw the ''Encyclopédie'' as a vehicle for covertly destroying [[superstition]]s while overtly providing access to human knowledge. In ''[[ancien régime]]'' France it caused a storm of controversy, due mostly to its tone of religious tolerance. The ''Encyclopédie'' praised [[Protestant]] thinkers and challenged [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] dogma, and classified religion as a branch of [[philosophy]], not as the ultimate source of knowledge and moral advice.
 +
 +At the same time, the ''Encyclopédie'' was a vast compendium of knowledge, notably on the technologies of the period, describing the traditional craft tools and processes. Much information was taken from the [[Descriptions des Arts et Métiers]].
 +
==Influence== ==Influence==
The ''Encyclopédie'' played an important role in the intellectual ferment leading to the [[French Revolution]]. "No encyclopaedia perhaps has been of such political importance, or has occupied so conspicuous a place in the civil and literary history of its century. It sought not only to give information, but to guide opinion," wrote the [[1911 Encyclopædia Britannica|1911 ''Encyclopædia Britannica'']]. In ''The Encyclopédie and the Age of Revolution'', a work published in conjunction with a 1989 exhibition of the ''Encyclopédie'' at the University of California, Los Angeles, Clorinda Donato writes the following: The ''Encyclopédie'' played an important role in the intellectual ferment leading to the [[French Revolution]]. "No encyclopaedia perhaps has been of such political importance, or has occupied so conspicuous a place in the civil and literary history of its century. It sought not only to give information, but to guide opinion," wrote the [[1911 Encyclopædia Britannica|1911 ''Encyclopædia Britannica'']]. In ''The Encyclopédie and the Age of Revolution'', a work published in conjunction with a 1989 exhibition of the ''Encyclopédie'' at the University of California, Los Angeles, Clorinda Donato writes the following:

Revision as of 11:08, 27 December 2009

Related e

Wikipedia
Wiktionary
Shop


Featured:

Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers (that is, "Encyclopedia, or a systematic dictionary of the sciences, arts, and crafts") was an encyclopedia published in France between 1751 and 1766, with later supplements and revisions in 1772, 1777 and 1780 and numerous foreign editions and later derivatives.

Its introduction, the Preliminary Discourse, is considered an important exposition of Enlightenment ideals. The Encyclopédie's self-professed aim was "to change the way people think."

Contents

The introduction to the Encyclopédie, D'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse, is considered an important exposition of Enlightenment ideals. Among other things, it presents a taxonomy of human knowledge (See fig.3) which was inspired by Francis Bacon's Advancement of Knowledge. The three main branches of knowledge are: "Memory"/History, "Reason"/Philosophy, and "Imagination"/Poetry. Notable is the fact that theology is ordered under 'Philosophy'. Robert Darnton argues that this categorisation of religion as being subject to human reason and not a source of knowledge in and of itself, was a significant factor in the controversy surrounding the work. Additionally, notice that 'Knowledge of God' is only a few nodes away from 'Divination' and 'Black Magic'.

Likewise, many contributors saw the Encyclopédie as a vehicle for covertly destroying superstitions while overtly providing access to human knowledge. In ancien régime France it caused a storm of controversy, due mostly to its tone of religious tolerance. The Encyclopédie praised Protestant thinkers and challenged Catholic dogma, and classified religion as a branch of philosophy, not as the ultimate source of knowledge and moral advice.

At the same time, the Encyclopédie was a vast compendium of knowledge, notably on the technologies of the period, describing the traditional craft tools and processes. Much information was taken from the Descriptions des Arts et Métiers.

Influence

The Encyclopédie played an important role in the intellectual ferment leading to the French Revolution. "No encyclopaedia perhaps has been of such political importance, or has occupied so conspicuous a place in the civil and literary history of its century. It sought not only to give information, but to guide opinion," wrote the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica. In The Encyclopédie and the Age of Revolution, a work published in conjunction with a 1989 exhibition of the Encyclopédie at the University of California, Los Angeles, Clorinda Donato writes the following:

The encyclopedians successfully argued and marketed their belief in the potential of reason and unified knowledge to empower human will and thus helped to shape the social issues that the French Revolution would address. Although it is doubtful whether the many artisans, technicians, or laborers whose work and presence and interspersed throughout the Encyclopédie actually read it, the recognition of their work as equal to that of intellectuals, clerics, and rulers prepared the terrain for demands for increased representation. Thus the Encyclopédie served to recognize and galvanize a new power base, ultimately contributing to the destruction of old values and the creation of new ones (12).

But note Frank Kafker, who explains that the Encyclopedists were not a unified group:

despite their reputation, [the Encyclopedists] were not a close-knit group of radicals intent on subverting the Old Regime in France. Instead they were a disparate group of men of letters, physicians, scientists, craftsmen and scholars ... Even the small minority who were persecuted for writing articles belittling what they viewed as unreasonable customs—thus weakening the might of the Catholic Church and undermining that of the monarchy—did not envision that their ideas would encourage a revolution.

While it is debatable that the editors intended to have a radical influence on French society, it can hardly be denied that it did. The Encyclopédie denied that the teachings of the Catholic Church could be treated as authoritative in matters of science. The editors also refused to treat the decisions of political powers as definitive in intellectual or artistic questions. Given that Paris was the intellectual capital of Europe at the time and that many European leaders used French as their administrative language, these ideas had the capacity to spread.



Unless indicated otherwise, the text in this article is either based on Wikipedia article "Encyclopédie" or another language Wikipedia page thereof used under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License; or on research by Jahsonic and friends. See Art and Popular Culture's copyright notice.

Personal tools