From The Art and Popular Culture Encyclopedia

Revision as of 10:48, 3 June 2011 Jahsonic (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Current revision Jahsonic (Talk | contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{Template}}	+	#REDIRECT [[teleological argument]]
-		+
-	Diderot's celebrated ''[[Lettre sur les aveugles à l'usage de ceux qui voient]]'' ("Letter on the Blind") (1749), introduced him to the world as a daringly original thinker. The subject is a discussion of the interrelation between man's reason and the [[knowledge]] acquired through perception (the [[five senses]]). The title, "Letter on the Blind For the Use of Those Who See", also evoked some ironic doubt about who exactly were "the blind" under discussion. In the essay a blind English mathematician named Saunderson argues that since knowledge derives from the senses, then mathematics is the only form of knowledge that both he and a sighted person can agree about. It is suggested that the blind could be taught to read through their sense of touch (a later essay, ''[[Lettre sur les sourds et muets]]'', considered the case of a similar [[deprivation]] in the [[deaf]] and [[speech disorder|mute]]). What makes the ''Lettre sur les aveugles'' so remarkable, however, is its distinct, if undeveloped, presentation of the theory of [[Genetic variability|variation]] and [[natural selection]].<ref>Diderot's contemporary, also a Frenchman, [[Pierre Louis Maupertuis]]–who in 1745 was named Head of the Prussian Academy of Science under [[Frederic the Great]]– was developing similar ideas. These proto-evolutionary theories were by no means as thought out and systematic as those of [[Charles Darwin]] a hundred years later.</ref>	+
-		+
-	<blockquote>This powerful essay ... revolves around a remarkable deathbed scene in which a dying blind philosopher, Saunderson, rejects the arguments of a [[Divine Providence|providential]] God during his last hours. Saunderson's arguments are those of a Neo-[[Spinoza|Spinozist]], [[Naturalism (philosophy)|Naturalist]], and [[Fatalist]], using a sophisticated notion of the [[Spontaneous generation|self-generation]] and natural evolution of species without Creation or supernatural intervention. The notion of [[Materialism|"thinking matter"]] is upheld and the "[[argument from design]]" discarded ... as hollow and unconvincing. The work appeared anonymously ... and was vigorously suppressed by the authorities. Diderot, who had been under police surveillance since 1747, was swiftly identified as the author ... and was imprisoned for some months at [[Vincennes]], where he was visited almost daily by [[Rousseau]], at the time his closest and most assiduous ally.<ref>Jonathan I. Israel, ''[[Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750]].'' ([[Oxford University Press]]. 2001, 2002), p. 710</ref></blockquote>	+
-		+
-	{{GFDL}}	+

---

Current revision

1. REDIRECT teleological argument